Bee's interview with Garrett. BLAM It connects.

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interview
  • #31
Hi Sabine!

I think that the bottom line that I wanted to say in my previous comment is that one has to have some reasonable amount of *time* in order to be a heavy blogger. This is obvious. But one thing that is not obvious (at least to me) is how to find such a free time. (This is a worthy thing to look for if one is willing to write informative and high quality posts for the readers!). And, more importantly, quality of time, time to *think*. Once you have an idea or a thought that is crystal clear in your mind, writting is just a minor effort (apart from the problem of language, as you mention, which can be indeed terrible for non-native speakers!).

For me, finding time is not a question of discipline nor organization, which I do have a big sense of. What I need is some good amount (namely, several hours) of continuous, uninterrupted concentration (or contemplation!). I came to understand that I do no longer have such a luxury since my life has changed with a new family to "take care of" and a job that involved many responsabilities. Having a family is the best thing that ever happened to me and by no means I'd complain on that! It's really a question that in life we may lose some things but often gain others as well (sometimes even better ones), so it's really a question of how to adapt oneself for the new situation.


it doesn't take much of an internet connection to upload a textfile to blogger


Here I mean the use of many hyperlinks in the post. In order to do that, you have to have a good internet connection to navigate and find appropriate links to include.

In any case, my previous post here was not intended as a criticism for heavy bloggers! :bugeye: In special, I'm happy that there exists some "heavy bloggers" out there that usually include high quality posts, like those on Backreaction. :approve: Unfortunately, such blogs are few, but I presume it is not much "only" because of time, you know what I mean. :wink: There are a lot of other elements involved in writting good posts and frequently.Christine
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
ccdantas said:
What I need is some good amount (namely, several hours) of continuous, uninterrupted concentration (or contemplation!).

Agreed.

I came to understand that I do no longer have such a luxury since my life has changed with a new family to "take care of"

Agreed.

After living as a bachelor for many, many years, getting married four years ago was a huge shock to my system. Having a daughter a year ago (in a few weeks) was even more of a shock.

In particular, the amount of time I spend reading (both non-fiction and fiction) has plummeted. I still try, but ...

Right now, I'm reading a fascinating collection of Feynamn's letters, because I can read them one at a time while watching my daughter.

It's really a question that in life we may lose some things but often gain others as well (sometimes even better ones), so it's really a question of how to adapt oneself for the new situation.

Agreed.
 
  • #33
Garret, are you trying to embed the generations of the standard model into the E8? Traditionally that was the reason people started looking at it in the first place. It naturally holds the Sm ^3. I'm not sure if its big enough once you include gravity though.

The problem with the phenomenology was too many FcNcs as well as issues with chirality, that's why Stringy stuff has two copies of E8 in some of their approximations. But I agree, its really a beautiful group, E6 is too.
 
  • #34
Yes. A couple years ago I managed to combine gravity and all standard model fields, including one generation of fermions, into one connection. I was pretty happy about that, but struggling to figure out a natural way to include the two other generations. Three months ago I found out the Lie algebra I had built, after including all three generations, looks like it may be e8. This is very exciting, but I can't say yet for certain whether it works or not. It is big enough though. If it works, there will be some GUT X's left over, but not many. I'm currently trying to work out the correct assignments of particles to e8 roots, which is very fun.
 
  • #35
George Jones said:
In particular, the amount of time I spend reading (both non-fiction and fiction) has plummeted. I still try, but ...

Congratulations! You will see that, as time passes and your baby turn into that small human being, with her own thoughts, wishes, personality and love, how precious is every moment with her, a part of you, a part of this mysterious universe that we are trying to understand. All the best with your "new life"!
 
  • #36
Being a non-physicist, I have a couple of questions (the only (hopefully) intelligent ones I've been able to fomulate so far):

1. Earlier, jal mentioned the Zome model of E8, and I'm curious to know: just how accurate is that model? Does it conform to the mathematical equations?

http://content.answers.com/main/content/wp/en/thumb/d/d5/180px-E8_roots_zome.jpg

2. When the video talks about "rotating" the model, just how is it rotating - in 8 dimensions, or what? It's hard to see the exact rotation angle in the vid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #37
Unbeliever said:
2. When the video talks about "rotating" the model, just how is it rotating - in 8 dimensions, or what? It's hard to see the exact rotation angle in the vid.

I think that's right. the 8D space if being projected down to the 2D plane of your screen, so you are seeing the shadow of an eight dimensional rotation.

actually in the video i think there is a series of rotations where the plane of rotation may change from one to the next.btw Welcome Unbeliever! may you ask many a perceptive question here, and may a goodly share of them eventually get answered.

could be someone could do considerably better than I with this quetion about rotations, but its a start. :smile:
 
  • #38
Thanks Marcus! And thanks for the welcome!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
15K
  • · Replies 208 ·
7
Replies
208
Views
133K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K