jhooper3581
- 49
- 0
Hmm... Who wins?
The discussion centers around the comparison between Beethoven and Mozart, exploring their musical brilliance, personal preferences, and the subjective nature of musical enjoyment. Participants express their opinions on various aspects of both composers' works, including technical qualities, emotional impact, and historical context.
Participants generally express differing opinions on who is superior, with no consensus reached. While some appreciate Beethoven's emotional depth, others favor Mozart's brilliance, indicating a variety of personal preferences and interpretations.
Some participants note that the discussion is influenced by personal experiences and subjective enjoyment of music, which may not align with technical assessments of brilliance or skill.
Readers interested in classical music, music theory, and the historical context of composers may find this discussion engaging.
LOL thanks for the reply!cronxeh said:Beethoven. Most works of Mozart I find boring, boroquey, and classical. Beethoven on the other hand, is like Happy Hardcore vs Techno. It has a kick, a pizzazz, a vroom-vroom to your zoom-zoom![]()
Lacy33 said:Beethoven is NOT for children under 52.
Lacy33 said:Not crazy about the way this poll was worded because Mozart is probably more "brilliant."
Pythagorean said:Mozart, but to be fair, Mozart's father was a musician (genetic influence) and a music teacher (learned influence). Despite that, Mozart was said to go above and beyond his father's teachings, even as a child.
Stratosphere said:Why must people continue to compare them? They were both great, it's just a matter of personal taste.
How was he more "Brilliant"? I'd like to know.
lisab said:Beethoven's grandfather was a musical director, and his father was a choir singer and music teacher.
Char. Limit said:Johann Sebastian Bach was better than both of them, I'm afraid.
The Toccata and Fugue in D Minor is one of the best pieces that have been ever made in my quite prideful opinion.
A couple of the musical composition majors, and a few other musicians I went to Oberlin with claimed this was not a particularly good fugue, that Bach wrote many very much better ones. I'm not in a position to judge, but it always struck me as weird that anyone would prefer a piece that was intellectually more interesting over one that sounded better.Char. Limit said:The Toccata and Fugue in D Minor is one of the best pieces that have been ever made in my quite prideful opinion.
Char. Limit said:Johann Sebastian Bach was better than both of them, I'm afraid.
The Toccata and Fugue in D Minor is one of the best pieces that have been ever made in my quite prideful opinion.
He had a music gene?Mozart's father was a musician (genetic influence)
Andre said:Hmm, from pure unrational enjoyment of the music, it seems that the dynamics of Mozart hardly span 6-9dB and has a tight rhythm causing some boredom to me after maybe 10-15 minutes despite the genial harmonic melody, while, Beethoven especially in his later works- creates genial suspense to me with the variation in the full dynamic range from a single instrument in pianissimo to the full orchestra in fortissimo and variation in rhythm which never stops intrueging.
zoobyshoe said:Mozart was certainly more brilliant; quite the prodigy, but I had to vote for Beethoven because I like his music better.
Chi Meson said:... But in spirit of the poll I will instead say:
"yes"
leroyjenkens said:I like Tchaikovsky. ...
Dembadon said:leroyjenkens said:I like Tchaikovsky.
He is not one of the choices. *grumble*
elect_eng said:Beethoven is the "Einstein" of music.
zoobyshoe said:No. Einstein was the Stravinsky of physics.
fourier jr said:nuff said![]()