Best domains of astronomy to contact super-advanced E.T.?

In summary, Micromass says that it is unlikely that any extraterrestrial intelligence would be detectable by human beings in our lifetime, and that a career in this field is very risky.
  • #1
Omega Force
11
2
Hello.If one’s goal was to contact a technologically superior extraterrestrial being (or a group of beings, or a civilization), which domain(s) of astronomy should one specialize in precisely?1) Which type of astronomy should one specialize in?
Computational astronomy
Experimental astronomy
Instrumental astronomy
Observational astronomy
Theoretical astronomy2) Which particular subfields of astronomy should one specialize in?
Archaeoastronomy
Astrobiology
Astrochemistry
Astrometry
Astroparticle physics
Astrophysics
Cosmochemistry
Cosmology
Exoplanetology
Extragalactic astronomy
Galactic astronomy
Orbital mechanics
Physical cosmology
Planetary geology
Planetary science
Solar astronomy
Space exploration
Space physics
Stellar astronomy3) Which radiation should one observe?
Radio
Infrared
Visible-light (optical)
Ultraviolet
X-ray
Gamma-ray
Cosmic rays
Neutrino
Gravitational waveNote that I said “technologically superior”, so discovering microbial extraterrestrial life doesn’t cut it at all.
Also note that I said “contact”, so discovering a super-advanced extraterrestrial being more than 50 light years away probably doesn’t cut it either because you’ll never be able to “contact” them and get an answer within your lifetime; except if the technologically superior extraterrestrial being knows how to time travel, but since we don’t know if that’s even physically possible it might be a little risky to bet on the feasibility of time travel.Thanks in advance for your answers.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Your best chances are with science fiction writing, I'm afraid.
 
  • Like
Likes KingCrimson, Amrator, Larry Gopnik and 3 others
  • #3
Omega Force said:
Note that I said “technologically superior”, so discovering microbial extraterrestrial life doesn’t cut it at all.
Also note that I said “contact”, so discovering a super-advanced extraterrestrial being more than 50 light years away probably doesn’t cut it either because you’ll never be able to “contact” them and get an answer within your lifetime; except if the technologically superior extraterrestrial being knows how to time travel, but since we don’t know if that’s even physically possible it might be a little risky to bet on the feasibility of time travel.
Great post, I'm not qualified to answer your question however this will get an interesting discussion going. :thumbup:
 
  • Like
Likes Omega Force
  • #4
1oldman2 said:
Great post, I'm not qualified to answer your question however this will get an interesting discussion going. :thumbup:

It's not really a great post. Focusing your entire career on finding ET is just naive.
 
  • Like
Likes Student100 and DrSteve
  • #5
micromass said:
It's not really a great post. Focusing your entire career on finding ET is just naive.
Howdy all, :smile:
With all due respect to everyone's personal opinions on ETI, career choices and the like, I found the OP's post "great" due to the thought he put into the post. I definitely would like to avoid the appearance of "argumentative" here, however at least some of these links should be relatively on topic.
Thanks for your consideration.

http://www.seti.org/node/647 http://www.seti.org/ http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...iative-to-seek-extraterrestrial-intelligence/
http://www.scientificamerican.com/a...stems-may-be-a-giveaway-in-the-search-for-et/
https://www.coursera.org/learn/astrobiology/
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/nasa-mission-europa-search-extraterrestrial-life/story?id=28719191
 
Last edited:
  • #6
I agree with Micromass, basing a career on detecting extraterrestrial intelligence is naive. It's highly improbable that any such communication could be detected, especially within human lifespans.

The paths you listed are a bit misleading, none of them deal with finding extraterrestrial life per say. The closest is Astrobiology, but you may be rather disappointed with the goals and research of the field. E&M waves are a poor choice for detecting purposeful communication at the distances likely to exist between civilizations. Modulating gravitational waves, while possible, seems highly unlikely and energy intensive. Your best bet from the list are probably modulated neutrinos, but would still be bound by the likely large distances between communicable civilizations. They do at least have the benefit that they could be sent large distances above the noise floor given the right energy level.

Besides, any of these types of detection require so many variables beyond the signal itself, to border on a nil probability- even when given time-spans far longer than 100 years. You should find a career where you can be fulfilled, and actually are able to find work, and maybe volunteer for SETI when you have time.
 
  • Like
Likes Amrator and micromass
  • #7
Greetings, OP, micro and student100. I would like to begin my reply by stating that none of my posts in this thread or this forum for that matter should be construed as "Career or Educational Guidance" in any since of the word, that would be laughable in the extreme.
With that being said I should give the reason for my responding to this thread in the first place, I took the OP's opening line to be more of a hypothetical "what if" question rather than a straight forward request for career advice. It would be safe to say I agree with your opinions on the time frames v.s. rewards of a career based solely on one persons involvement, such a project has, is and will continue to be a huge collaboration spanning many years.
My previously posted links were only meant as a demonstration of the interest that continues to grow in the field. (see Tom.G's thread in Astronomy and Astrophysics, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2016-07/03/c_135485643.htm )
One requirement of anyone entering this field would have to be the attribute of "team player"
Thanks again and happy fourth of July,(or Juno day) no matter what part of the world you live in. :smile:

As a side note the notion of volunteering for SETI caught my attention and I'm now running a boinc program that studies photo-metric data of asteroids rather than searching for ET. :thumbup: http://asteroidsathome.net/index.html and since I can't resist a good Acronym http://astro.troja.mff.cuni.cz/projects/asteroids3D/web.php
Cheers
 
  • #8
1oldman2 said:
took the OP's opening line to be more of a hypothetical "what if" question rather than a straight forward request for career advice.

Right. But I think the OP should tell us a bit more as on why (s)he asked this very question. If the OP is interested in this as a hobby, then this is a fine thread and could lead to a fun discussion. But if (as a fear) the OP wants to make a career out of this, then (s)he will end up very very disappointed.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #9
Here is what http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary has to say about "naive"
"having or showing a lack of experience or knowledge"

Since nobody on this planet has any experience with extraterrestial intelligence, using that accusation as a derogatory remark seems rather strange.
 
  • #10
Tom.G said:
Since nobody on this planet has any experience with extraterrestial intelligence

Somehow that is the entire point...
 
  • Like
Likes Student100
  • #11
Tom.G said:
Here is what http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary has to say about "naive"
"having or showing a lack of experience or knowledge"

Since nobody on this planet has any experience with extraterrestial intelligence, using that accusation as a derogatory remark seems rather strange.

It isn't being used as a derogatory remark it's just simply a career hunting for ETI doesn't really exist- outside some handful of paid staff at SETI or wherever.

micromass said:
Somehow that is the entire point...
 
  • #12
I didn't create my thread in the "Academic Guidance" Forum. I created it in the "Astronomy and Astrophysics" Forum, and I believe that it would have been better there since this question is very specific and can only be answered by astrophysicists.

Also, saying that it's not a good career choice might be true, but it doesn't answer the question and is therefore off topic.
 
  • #13
:doh:
 
  • #14
Omega Force said:
Hello.If one’s goal was to contact a technologically superior extraterrestrial being (or a group of beings, or a civilization), which domain(s) of astronomy should one specialize in precisely?

I just spent four hours playing XCOM 2 on Ironman and at this point I'm really not convinced that contacting alien civilizations is a good idea. My poor recruits...

Anyway, it's not really going to be much of a career field. There are perhaps a dozen or so people in the world being paid any amount of money at all to do work directly related to looking for aliens.

If you really want to help in some specialist capacity, maybe you could design ASICs or computing clusters to volunteer for SETI@home.
 
  • #15
Omega Force said:
I didn't create my thread in the "Academic Guidance" Forum. I created it in the "Astronomy and Astrophysics" Forum, and I believe that it would have been better there since this question is very specific and can only be answered by astrophysicists.

Also, saying that it's not a good career choice might be true, but it doesn't answer the question and is therefore off topic.

It was moved because you asked what to study, thus academic guidance. You also wanted to know how to obtain a very specific career, thus the academic guidance given used that as a focal point.

Astrophysicists aren't going to answer this any differently than what was said, because it's so far outside the realm of their (or anyone's really) specialty.
 
  • #16
Omega Force said:
I didn't create my thread in the "Academic Guidance" Forum. I created it in the "Astronomy and Astrophysics" Forum, and I believe that it would have been better there since this question is very specific and can only be answered by astrophysicists.

Also, saying that it's not a good career choice might be true, but it doesn't answer the question and is therefore off topic.

Astrophysicists don't deal with contacting super-advanced ET. It is completely outside their scope. So I don't know why you want astrophysicists to answer this.
 
  • Like
Likes Amrator
  • #17
http://www.seti.org/careers

That's probably the closest you'll get. I would imagine it's very competitive, so good luck.
From what I understand, most astrobiological research really consists of studying planetary habitability and the conditions required for abiogenesis. So if you can't get a job at SETI, you're most likely out of luck if all you want to do is "contact advanced E.T.s".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Tom.G
  • #18
jack476 said:
If you really want to help in some specialist capacity, maybe you could design ASICs or computing clusters to volunteer for SETI@home.
These guys are going to be drowning in data relative to processing power as the next generations telescopes come on line over the next ten years. You have a very good point about the computer sciences field, its far more likely to pay ones bills
 

1. What are the best domains of astronomy to contact super-advanced E.T.?

The best domains of astronomy to contact super-advanced E.T. would be those that focus on studying exoplanets (planets outside of our solar system) and astrobiology (the study of life in the universe). These fields are directly related to the search for extraterrestrial life and would provide the most relevant information for contacting advanced beings.

2. How do we know which domains of astronomy to focus on for contacting super-advanced E.T.?

The decision on which domains of astronomy to focus on for contacting super-advanced E.T. is based on a combination of factors, including the likelihood of finding habitable exoplanets and the potential for advanced life forms to exist on those planets. Scientists also consider the technological capabilities of these advanced beings, and which signals or methods would be most effective for communication.

3. Is there a specific technique or technology used to contact super-advanced E.T.?

Currently, there is no specific technique or technology that has been proven to effectively contact super-advanced E.T. Scientists are constantly developing new methods and technologies, such as radio telescopes and laser communication, in hopes of establishing communication with advanced beings. However, there is no guarantee that these methods will be successful.

4. How long would it take for a message to reach super-advanced E.T. using current technology?

The time it would take for a message to reach super-advanced E.T. using current technology would depend on the distance between our planet and the potential location of these beings. For example, it would take approximately four years for a message to reach the nearest potentially habitable exoplanet, Proxima Centauri b, using our current technology.

5. What is the likelihood of successfully contacting super-advanced E.T.?

The likelihood of successfully contacting super-advanced E.T. is currently unknown. It is possible that these beings may have the technology and capabilities to receive and interpret our messages, but it is also possible that they may not be interested in communicating with us or may not even exist. It is important for scientists to continue researching and developing methods for contacting advanced beings, but it is impossible to predict the outcome or success of these efforts.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
2
Replies
62
Views
53K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
25
Views
7K
Back
Top