Bijections result when the function is surjective and injective

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Bijections occur when a function is both surjective and injective. The function f(x) = 2x + 1 serves as a bijection between the set of natural numbers (N) and the set of all odd numbers. To establish that f is one-to-one, one must prove that if f(n) = f(m), then n = m. Additionally, to demonstrate that f is onto, it is necessary to show that for every odd number m, there exists an integer n such that 2n + 1 = m.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bijections in set theory
  • Knowledge of surjective and injective functions
  • Familiarity with natural numbers (N) and odd numbers
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of bijections in set theory
  • Learn how to prove functions are injective and surjective
  • Explore the concept of power sets, specifically P(N) and P(Z)
  • Investigate examples of bijections between different sets
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying set theory, and anyone interested in understanding the concepts of bijections, surjective, and injective functions.

laminatedevildoll
Messages
211
Reaction score
0
Bijections result when the function is surjective and injective.

How do I find a bijection in N and the set of all odd numbers?

f(x) = 2x+1

Do I have to prove that this is one-to-one and onto? Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
laminatedevildoll said:
Bijections result when the function is surjective and injective.

How do I find a bijection in N and the set of all odd numbers?

f(x) = 2x+1

Do I have to prove that this is one-to-one and onto? Am I on the right track?
Yes. Can you prove that for all n and m in N, if f(n) = f(m), then n = m? (Just plug and play.)
 
You would also, of course, have to prove that it is a surjection: that is, that if m is an odd number then there exist an integer n such that 2n+ 1= m.
 
You can get the surjection from the definition of odd number.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your help. I think that I need a lot of practice using the definition.
 
Which definition- bijection?
 
honestrosewater said:
Which definition- bijection?

Yeah. It's kind of frustrating to prove if a function is one-to-one or onto when one way of proving for one problem doesn't apply to the next. It's all about playing around with the definition and all.
 
What's the difference between finding a bijection between P(N) and P(Z) AND N and Z? P stands for power set (the curly P).
 
You mean a bijection between P(N) and P(Z) compared to a bijection between N and Z?

I've never done that kind of thing but I think if you have a bijection between N and Z then you automatically have a bijection between P(N) and P(Z) by replacing every element x of N in a given element y of P(N) with f(x) and mapping y to the resulting element z, which will be in P(Z). If you have a bijiection between P(N) and P(Z) then I don't think you necessarily can say you have a bijection between N and Z.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K