Blackbody radiation in quantum mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of blackbody radiation on the internal states of particles in thermal baths, particularly focusing on whether the resulting state is classical or quantum mechanical. Participants explore the implications of thermal interactions on energy distributions, coherence, and measurement outcomes, with references to practical contexts such as atomic clocks and Penning traps.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether particles in a thermal bath will have well-defined energy states or exist in superpositions influenced by blackbody radiation.
  • Another participant suggests that the final state will likely be an incoherent mixed state, particularly when influenced by macroscopic noise sources, which tend to destroy coherence.
  • Practical implications are discussed, such as the role of blackbody radiation in causing instability in atomic clocks due to dephasing effects.
  • A specific scenario is presented involving a molecule in a Penning trap, questioning whether it remains in a single quantum state or becomes a superposition of states due to blackbody radiation.
  • It is noted that while coherent superpositions are theoretically possible, they are statistically unlikely due to the scrambling effects of broadband, incoherent light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the likelihood of coherent superpositions arising from blackbody radiation, with some arguing that classical states are more probable. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific outcomes of interactions between particles and thermal radiation.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of interactions in specific experimental setups, such as atoms in cavities, and the dependence on various factors like temperature and the nature of the radiation.

Malamala
Messages
348
Reaction score
28
Hello! If I place a particle with more energy levels (of the order of kT) in a well defined state, in a thermal bath at temperature T, how will the blackbody radiation affect the internal state of the particle i.e. will the distribution be classical or QM? Basically, if I prepare that particle in that state, let it there a long enough time and measure it and I repeat this many times, I expect the populated energy levels to be given by a Boltzmann distribution. In the end, did each particle have a well defined energy, but different particles had different energies. Or all the particles ended up in the same superposition of different energies with weights given by the Boltzmann distribution, and when I measure them I make the energy collapse according to that weight? So, is the particle after that interaction with the thermal bath in a well defined state or in a superposition? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Malamala said:
So, is the particle after that interaction with the thermal bath in a well defined state or in a superposition?
As a (very very good) rule of thumb, the final state will be an incoherent state (a mixed state where the off-diagonals of the density matrix, i.e. the coherences, tend to zero). However, if you do this with atoms in cavities, things get a little weird. I'm not an expert, but there are more complications to consider in that case.

In general, interactions with random, macroscopic noise sources tends to destroy coherence.

To put your question in a practical context, blackbody radiation is a major source of instability in atomic clocks. The interaction of the blackbody photons with the atoms results in dephasing, which shows up in Rabi or Ramsey sequences as decoherence (loss of contrast). This is why blackbody shielding is a key ingredient in any precision spectroscopy experiment.
 
Twigg said:
As a (very very good) rule of thumb, the final state will be an incoherent state (a mixed state where the off-diagonals of the density matrix, i.e. the coherences, tend to zero). However, if you do this with atoms in cavities, things get a little weird. I'm not an expert, but there are more complications to consider in that case.

In general, interactions with random, macroscopic noise sources tends to destroy coherence.

To put your question in a practical context, blackbody radiation is a major source of instability in atomic clocks. The interaction of the blackbody photons with the atoms results in dephasing, which shows up in Rabi or Ramsey sequences as decoherence (loss of contrast). This is why blackbody shielding is a key ingredient in any precision spectroscopy experiment.
To give an actual example, say I place a molecule in a Penning trap, in the ground vibrational state (by vibrational I mean CM vibrations), and in the ground internal vibrational and electronic state and J = 5. If the walls of the trap have a temperature T and I somehow check the J state after a time long enough for BB radiation to matter but shorter than the decay lifetime of the state, and say I find J=4, is the molecule fully in that state, as it was in J=5 initially (e.g. by stimulated emission due to the BB photons), or it is somehow a linear combination of J=4, J=5 and eventually other J values, and I just happened to make the wavefunction collapse in J=4?
 
Malamala said:
it is somehow a linear combination of J=4, J=5 and eventually other J values, and I just happened to make the wavefunction collapse in J=4?
It is theoretically possible but extremely statistically unlikely for blackbody radiation to cause a coherent superposition after a long interaction time. You will most likely find your single molecule classically in one J state or the other. The reason for this is that broadband, incoherent light tends to scramble superpositions (or any coherent information, for that matter). There is a way to prove this, but I'm a bit fuzzy on the details. Let me know if you're interested in a mathematical argument and I'll try to dig it up.
 
Twigg said:
It is theoretically possible but extremely statistically unlikely for blackbody radiation to cause a coherent superposition after a long interaction time. You will most likely find your single molecule classically in one J state or the other. The reason for this is that broadband, incoherent light tends to scramble superpositions (or any coherent information, for that matter). There is a way to prove this, but I'm a bit fuzzy on the details. Let me know if you're interested in a mathematical argument and I'll try to dig it up.
Thanks a lot, that makes sense. And sure, if you can I would like to see a derivation of that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
926
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K