Bloomsbury Dictionary of Euphemisms

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dj Sneaky Whiskers
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Euphemisms, authored by John Ayto, is celebrated for its narrative style that goes beyond mere definitions, offering insights into the significance and usage of euphemisms in contemporary language, particularly in contexts like war. Despite its engaging content, the book faces criticism for its unappealing cover design and poor paper quality, which detracts from its overall aesthetic. Nonetheless, it is regarded as an invaluable resource for language enthusiasts, comparable to the Oxford English Dictionary in its ability to evoke appreciation for the richness of language. The discussion emphasizes that while the physical presentation may be lacking, the book's informative and entertaining content makes it a worthwhile addition to any collection.
Dj Sneaky Whiskers
Bloomsbury Dictionary of Euphemisms

John Ayto

Bloomsbury Reference (www.bloomsbury.com)

ISBN 0-7475-5045-X


Introduction:

Its a dictionary of Euphemisms. Surely I don't have to explain to you why this is possibly the greatest, most desirable book ever written/compiled.

Pros:

IT'S A DICTIONARY OF EUPHEMISMS! Plus it's *not* just a dictionary, oh no. In addition to listing and explaining common euphemisms, it is written primarily in a narrative style, explaining the relevence of the items listed, detailing the role of euphemism, as well as offering a commentary upon the origins and contemporary use of particularly powerful examples (the section on war being particularly interesting at this point in time).

Cons:

Like the pope, this book cannot be faulted. Like the pope, it hides in a rather silly looking contraption, in this case the cover. Yes, I'm onto covers again. In this case there's a dreadfully pedestrian illustration of light emerging from behind a partially darkened Earth which is set within complete darkness. Yeah, sole beacon, gotcha. Nice one. I know I labour this point throughout my reviews, but I believe that any cultured and civilised society needs to respect and appreciate aesthetic quality. Unfortunately, it would appear that the marketing department at Bloomsbury thought it would be a good idea to ask some self-consciously 'profound' adolescent to design the cover to this book. Also, it's printed on rubbish paper, which means it feels like some horrific romance novel in the hand.

Conclusion:

Despite the cover, this is a remarkably entertaining book as every bit entertaining as it is usefull. Second only to the full edition Oxford dictionary in terms of creating a sensation of glee, awe and love at the power of language (and don't give me any grief over the relative merits of Webster's or Collins, I don't want to know - find the full multi-volume Oxford English Dictionary and behold its sheer beauty, both aesthetic and functional. The sight will make you weep like a bereaved child as you recall your wrong headed preference!).
 
Physics news on Phys.org



I completely agree with your enthusiasm for the Bloomsbury Dictionary of Euphemisms. It is indeed a valuable resource for anyone interested in the power and versatility of language. The narrative style adds an extra layer of depth to the dictionary, making it not just a list of words, but a commentary on the role and use of euphemisms in our society.

I also share your disappointment with the cover design and paper quality. It is a shame that such a brilliant book is not given the aesthetic treatment it deserves. However, as you rightly pointed out, it is the content that truly matters and in that aspect, the Bloomsbury Dictionary of Euphemisms excels.

I also appreciate your comparison to the Oxford English Dictionary, as both books truly showcase the beauty and complexity of the English language. Thank you for your insightful review and for highlighting the merits of this fantastic dictionary.
 
Im currently reading mathematics for physicists by Philippe Dennery and André Krzywicki, and I’m understanding most concepts however I think it would be better for me to get a book on complex analysis or calculus to better understand it so I’m not left looking at an equation for an hour trying to figure out what it means. So here comes the split, do I get a complex analysis book? Or a calculus book? I might be able to Borrow a calculus textbook from my math teacher study that for a bit and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K