Blueshift in case of the Big Crunch scenario

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 2K views
hedgehug
Messages
54
Reaction score
1
According to the FLRW metric which is used to model the expanding universe, if at present time we receive light from a distant object with a redshift of ##z##, then the scale factor at the time the object originally emitted that light is ##a(t)=1/(z+1)##.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale_factor_(cosmology)#Detail

Radiation emitted at the time of the expansion reversal and observed later during the collapse would be blueshifted, but this formula definition accounts only for the redshift.

Does it mean that the FLRW metric is valid only for the expanding universe?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
##1+z=a_\mathrm{received}/a_\mathrm{emit}## in any FLRW model including a closed one that collapses. You can see this by considering the Killing fields and remembering that ##p_a\xi^a=\mathrm{const}## along a geodesic.
 
If the radiation was emitted at the time of the expansion reversal and observed during the collapse, then ##a_{rec}/a_{emit}<1##. How about ##1+z##?
 
##z## is no longer redshift if ##z+1<1##.
 
The point is that ##1+z## is the ratio of wavelengths measured locally at emission and reception, so when this is greater than 1 then ##z## is positive and you have redshift. When it's less than one then ##z## is negative and you have blueshift.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
True. It's just a matter of the words used in the definition. Formula remains valid.

Your explanations are correct. Just note that there was a Blushift in the title of the thread since the beginning.
 
Last edited:
hedgehug said:
Radiation emitted at the time of the expansion reversal and observed later during the collapse would be blueshifted, but this formula definition accounts only for the redshift.

Does it mean that the FLRW metric is valid only for the expanding universe?
No, that doesn't follow from what Wikipedia says. Wikipedia states that the FLRW metric is used to model the expanding universe, but it doesn't say that it can't be used to model a contracting one.
 
Jaime Rudas said:
No, that doesn't follow from what Wikipedia says. Wikipedia states that the FLRW metric is used to model the expanding universe, but it doesn't say that it can't be used to model a contracting one.
Yeah, I already know it from Ibix. Thank you very much.