Born Conditions on Wavefunctions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Born's conditions for acceptable wavefunctions in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the continuity of the derivative of a wavefunction at a point where it has a cusp. Participants explore the implications of these conditions using the example of the wavefunction F(x) = exp[-|x|].

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants outline Born's conditions for a well-behaved wavefunction, emphasizing the need for continuity and the behavior of the derivative.
  • One participant questions whether the derivative dF/dx is continuous at x = 0 for the wavefunction F(x) = exp[-|x|].
  • Another participant asserts that dF/dx is not continuous at x = 0, linking this to implications for energy in the Schrödinger equation.
  • It is suggested that idealizations in potential steps and wavefunctions may not reflect reality, as real potentials vary continuously.
  • A participant notes that while F(x) has a cusp at x = 0, it can still be considered an acceptable wavefunction under certain interpretations of Born's conditions.
  • Contrarily, another participant argues that the wavefunction cannot perfectly represent reality but may serve as a good approximation away from the cusp.
  • One participant claims that the cusp does not pose problems for the wavefunction due to cancellation effects in the kinetic and potential energy terms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the acceptability of the wavefunction F(x) = exp[-|x|] under Born's conditions, particularly regarding the continuity of its derivative at x = 0. There is no consensus on whether this wavefunction can be considered "well-behaved" in all contexts.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include assumptions about idealized potentials and the nature of wavefunctions, as well as the implications of discontinuities in derivatives on physical interpretations. The conversation reflects a range of interpretations regarding the applicability of Born's conditions.

scarecrow
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
Born's conditions for an acceptable "well-behaved" wavefunction F(x):
1. it must be finite everywhere, i.e. converge to 0 as x -> infinity
2. it must be single-valued
3. it must be a continuous function
4. and dF/dx must be continuous.

I'm having difficulty understanding the last condition for a specific example. I have a wavefunction, F(x) = exp[-|x|], and the derivative at x = 0 does not exist. Is dF/dx still continuous at x=0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Is dF/dx still continuous at x=0?"
It is not. If F' is not continuous, then F"-->infinity, which corresponds to an infinite energy in the Schrödinger eq. This can only happen at an infinite potential step, such as in what is called an "infinite square well".
 
And in such cases, the discontinuous step in the potential and in F' are idealizations which are not possible in reality, although they are useful as approximations to make the solutions simpler. In reality, the potential always varies continuously (although very rapidly in this case) and F' also varies continuously but rapidly.

Instead of a perfectly "vertical" potential step, V(x) might have a steep slope that is almost (but not quite) vertical, and F(x) has a short rounded section instead of a sharp kink.
 
F(x) is continuous and has a "cusp" at x = 0, hence the first derivative of F(x) is discontinous at x=0 and is only piecewise continuous. But this doesn't prevent F(x) from being an acceptable "well-behaved" wavefunction.

F(x) must be continuous, but F' can be piecewise continuous for the wavefunction to be an acceptable Born function.
This is a paraphrase from one of my textbooks.

So exp[-|x|] is an acceptable "well-behaved" wavefunction according to this?
 
The correct answer to your question is 'no it is not'. It cannot represent reality perfectly. However, it may be a good approximation of the true wavefunction away from 0.
 
By definition, an exact wave-function will have a constant local energy as a function of position. The cusp in the wave function at x = 0 poses no problems as the divergence in the kinetic component is exactly canceled by the potential term, namely the coulomb term. This is an exact wave-function and there are no problems here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K