Bosonic operators and fourier transformation.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical manipulation of bosonic operators and their relation to Fourier transformations. The expression for the product a_m a_{m+1} is questioned, with the suggestion to express it as a double sum to utilize the delta function for simplification. Corrections are made regarding the exponent in the expression and the nature of a_m+1, indicating it should be a complex conjugate. Additionally, there is confusion about the equality (a_k)^{\dagger}a_k = (a_{-k})^{\dagger}a_{-k}, which does not hold under the current definitions used. The conversation highlights the complexities in handling bosonic operators and their mathematical properties.
barnflakes
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
If a_m = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}} \sum_k e^{-ikm}a_k
where a_k is a bosonic operator fulfilling [a_k, a_{k'}^{\dagger}] = \delta_{kk'}

then is the product a_m a_{m+1} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_k e^{-ikm}e^{-ik(m+1)}a_k a_{k+1}

? Because that's what I'm doing but it doesn't lead me anywhere near to the correct answer in my textbook.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NO! You need to first express it as a double sum. Then this can be collapsed using the δ function.

Also (I believe) the exponent should be -ikm+ik(m+1) - assuming you are using the bracket function. am+1 should be a complex conjugate.
 
OK I fixed that, thanks.

One thing is that my notes often say (a_k)^{\dagger}a_k = (a_{-k})^{\dagger}a_{-k} but I did some calculations with the definition of a_k and didn't find this to be true. Any idea what is going on?
 
I am not familiar with the physics involved, so I don't know the definition for ak.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K