Bottle Opener Design for Arthritis Sufferers: Force and Deflection Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter tompotts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on designing a bottle opener specifically for individuals with arthritis, focusing on the necessary force and deflection to effectively remove crown tops. The original poster, Tom, seeks empirical data on the force required, as well as insights into the design considerations for ease of use. Participants suggest measuring the force needed by elongating the opener and conducting trials to gather data, while also highlighting potential hazards related to damaged bottles. The conversation emphasizes the importance of user testing and ergonomic design for accessibility.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of leverage equations in mechanical design
  • Familiarity with anthropometric data for ergonomic applications
  • Knowledge of material properties related to bottle caps and glass
  • Experience with user testing methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for measuring force required to open bottle caps
  • Explore ergonomic design principles for assistive devices
  • Investigate user testing protocols for product development
  • Learn about the impact of material defects on product safety
USEFUL FOR

Product designers, mechanical engineers, occupational therapists, and anyone involved in creating assistive devices for individuals with physical limitations.

tompotts
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Im designing a bottle opener to remove crown tops from beer and soda bottles. I know that its been done a hundred times before so don't tell me that please. I am designing the bottle opener so that it can be easilly and comfortably used by people who suffer from arthritis in the arms and hands.

Basically I have all the general leverage equations that i need, I also have the anthropometric data for the users, but i cannot find the amount of force needed to remove a crown top from a bottle, also the deflection needed to remove the top :frown: .

I have scoured the internet high and low to try and find this data, but it doesn't seem to be available anywhere.

If anybody on here has ever done anything that relates to this before and could help me out I would be eternally greatfull as this is for my final year major project.

Thankyou for your time reading this post.

Tom :bugeye:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Sounds like it is time for some measurements.
 
The simplest way to do this would be to elongate the bottle opener(with the "grip area" at the end of course)
With a "double-length" bottle opener, the elderly or arthritic would have to raise the bottle opener twice the standard distance, but with only half the standard force.
 
Yup, time to get measuring. You've probably researched this already, but don't forget that the top is often deformed and weakened by a tooth which dents the top of the, uhh, top as the flange is being lifted.
 
I agree. Something like this has so much randomness to it that you would have to measure for yourself. I guess you could always try writing the PR dept. of some bottle opener companys and ask if they have that kind of data from their own research. I wouldn't hold my breath though.
 
I'll just add a warning of my own to Brewnog's, since it's something that could provide a hazard for elderly, blind, etc.. users. Since we've started recycling bottles here simply by cleaning and reusing them rather than melting them down and making new ones, I've run across an awful lot that will chip when opened. The problem arises in the twist-off type of beer bottles. When one with a chipped thread is reused, the cap crimps into the chip. This means that part of the cap is indented in such a way that it can't be twisted off, and a mechanical opener will often cause the damaged part of the cap to knock off part of the thread or rim when torqued up. Even if the chipped area itself isn't particularly hazardous, glass particles can end up in the beer.
 
Integral said:
Sounds like it is time for some measurements.
Great excuse for a party...
 
Is there a way to account for errors after a certain nnumber of tests? My precision would go down pretty quickly after about 4 "trials."
 
Lame party, Fred. 10 people, 4 "trials" each... now that has the makings of a decent party.
 
  • #10
I think that the later trials would allow for a more realistic sample to be taken; not all bottles are going to be opened while sober after all.

Tom, don't forget to account for the fact that I need to be able to remove the lid whilst bladdered. Perhaps training a monkey should be investigated?
 
  • #11
russ_watters said:
Lame party, Fred. 10 people, 4 "trials" each... now that has the makings of a decent party.
You better invite me to this party...er...I mean trial. I don't have arthritis, but I have a thumb that's been hurting a lot since I injured it this summer, and it definitely has made my grip weaker. I'd be a good test subject. And after the first two or three trials, I can also help you as a test subject for those who lack the typical coordination needed to open bottle tops.
 
  • #12
Thanks a lot for all the tips and advice guys. there's some good points in there.
Ill be sure to let you all know how the testing session goes! :biggrin: :bugeye:
Thanks a lot for your time on this one.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
13K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K