So here's the problem:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm asked to find the solutions to the 1-D Wave equation

[tex]u_{tt} = u_{xx}[/tex]

subject to

[tex] u(x,0) = g(x), u_t(x,0) = h(x)[/tex]

but also

[tex] u_t(0,t) = A*u_x(0,t)[/tex]

and discuss why A = -1 does not allow valid solutions. I can't figure it out at all. The solutions to the usual problem with initial conditions is just the D'alembert formula... but adding this restriction seems to overdetermine the problem. We can turn that second condition into the full 1-D wave equation but it involves squaring A, which means that if A = +/- 1 it works... and otherwise it is overdetermined. Can anyone else help me?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Boundary Value Problem for the 1-D Wave

Loading...

Similar Threads - Boundary Value Problem | Date |
---|---|

A Understanding dummy variable in solution of 1D heat equation | Nov 3, 2017 |

I Applications needing fast numerical conformal maps | Sep 15, 2016 |

A Boundary Value Problem | May 30, 2016 |

A Boundary Value Problem Requiring Quarterwave Symmetry | Apr 10, 2016 |

Shooting method for BVP | Apr 7, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**