Boundary Value Problem for the 1-D Wave

  • Thread starter bndnchrs
  • Start date
  • #1
bndnchrs
29
0
So here's the problem:

I'm asked to find the solutions to the 1-D Wave equation

[tex]u_{tt} = u_{xx}[/tex]

subject to

[tex] u(x,0) = g(x), u_t(x,0) = h(x)[/tex]

but also

[tex] u_t(0,t) = A*u_x(0,t)[/tex]

and discuss why A = -1 does not allow valid solutions. I can't figure it out at all. The solutions to the usual problem with initial conditions is just the D'alembert formula... but adding this restriction seems to overdetermine the problem. We can turn that second condition into the full 1-D wave equation but it involves squaring A, which means that if A = +/- 1 it works... and otherwise it is overdetermined. Can anyone else help me?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
bndnchrs
29
0
should be moved to homework... sorry!
 

Suggested for: Boundary Value Problem for the 1-D Wave

Replies
3
Views
165
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
552
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
606
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
921
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
726
Replies
7
Views
177
Top