Boundary Value Problem for the 1-D Wave

  • Thread starter bndnchrs
  • Start date
  • #1
29
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

So here's the problem:

I'm asked to find the solutions to the 1-D Wave equation

[tex]u_{tt} = u_{xx}[/tex]

subject to

[tex] u(x,0) = g(x), u_t(x,0) = h(x)[/tex]

but also

[tex] u_t(0,t) = A*u_x(0,t)[/tex]

and discuss why A = -1 does not allow valid solutions. I can't figure it out at all. The solutions to the usual problem with initial conditions is just the D'alembert formula... but adding this restriction seems to overdetermine the problem. We can turn that second condition into the full 1-D wave equation but it involves squaring A, which means that if A = +/- 1 it works... and otherwise it is overdetermined. Can anyone else help me?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
29
0
should be moved to homework... sorry!
 

Related Threads on Boundary Value Problem for the 1-D Wave

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
954
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
5K
Top