Bounding General Shapes with Polygons, Especially Concave

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a 1999/2000 algorithm developed for bounding general shapes with polygons, particularly concave polygons. This algorithm is noted for its speed and versatility across polygons with varying numbers of sides. The author is seeking to determine the current relevance of this solution and whether their former employer holds any rights to the algorithm, potentially considering legal action if it has been sold. The need for updated insights or findings on polygonal math is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polygonal mathematics
  • Familiarity with algorithms and heuristics
  • Knowledge of concave and convex shapes
  • Basic legal concepts regarding intellectual property
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in polygonal bounding algorithms
  • Explore legal frameworks for algorithm ownership and patent rights
  • Investigate current applications of concave polygon algorithms in computational geometry
  • Study heuristic methods in algorithm design for efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algorithm developers, legal professionals in intellectual property, and anyone interested in computational geometry and polygonal mathematics.

downplay
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I apologize if this is the wrong forum but I need access to mathematicians who know what's happening with polygonal math.

I created an unproven algorithm (or heuristic) back in 1999/2000 for bounding shapes with polygons. It was interesting because it was fast, general for polygons of any number of sides, and especially that it worked for concave polygons.

I am trying to figure out if this is still a needed solution for the world. I wonder if my employer of the time may have sold it. If not, I am not sure they own the rights to it anyway. If they sold it, I want to see if a lawsuit is worthwhile.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K