Bra ket notation for magnitude of two vectors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the relationship between inner products of vectors and their magnitudes. The original poster presents a problem involving the Fourier expansion of a function in terms of basis vectors and seeks clarification on the manipulation of these expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the equivalence of expressions involving inner products and question the implications of using conjugates in the context of vectors. There are attempts to clarify the notation and its mathematical properties, particularly regarding duals and coefficients in vector spaces.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationships between the expressions and the properties of inner products, while others are questioning the terminology and the implications of working in real versus complex vector spaces. The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the distinction between vectors and their duals, as well as the implications of working with complex coefficients in the context of bra-ket notation. Participants are navigating through the nuances of terminology and mathematical properties without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Vitani11
Messages
275
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


If I had two vectors say ⟨em|f⟩⟨f|em⟩ does this equal |⟨em|f⟩|2? e is a basis and f is some arbitrary function. I ask this because I have a problem which is to show the following: Show that for the Fourier expansion of |f⟩ in terms of Fourier basis vectors |em⟩ is ρ2(|f⟩,|fn⟩) = {⟨f|f⟩-∑|⟨em|f⟩|2+∑|amn-|⟨em|f⟩|2.

Homework Equations


a = linear combinations of a(ij)m
ρ2(|f⟩,|fn⟩) Fourier expansion of |f⟩ in terms of Fourier basis vectors |em
f is some function
fn is the nth function
All summations are from m=-n to n

The Attempt at a Solution


Here is what I have done:
ρ2(|f⟩,|fn⟩)=(⟨f|-⟨fn|)(|f⟩-|fn⟩)
=⟨f|f⟩-⟨f|fn⟩-⟨fn|f⟩+⟨fn|fn
= ⟨f|f⟩-⟨f|∑amn|em⟩-⟨fn|f⟩+⟨fn|∑amn|em
=⟨f|f⟩-⟨f|∑amn|em⟩-⟨fn|∑|⟨em|f⟩|em
= ⟨f|f⟩-⟨fn|∑⟨em|f⟩em⟩+⟨fn|∑amn|em⟩-⟨f|∑amn|em
= ⟨f|f⟩-∑⟨em|f⟩⟨fn|em⟩+Σ(amn⟨fn|em⟩-amn⟨f|em⟩)

Now what do I do? I see that I need to get rid of fn, but even with a list of bra-ket rules I can't seem to figure it out.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Vitani11 said:
If I had two vectors say ⟨em|f⟩⟨f|em⟩ does this equal |⟨em|f⟩|2?
It is correct that ##\langle e_m|f\rangle\langle f|e_m\rangle=|\langle e_m|f\rangle|^2##.

To prove it, just write ##\langle e_m|f\rangle## as ##a+bi## and use the facts that ##\langle e_m|f\rangle=\langle f|e_m\rangle^*## and ##|a+bi|=\sqrt{a^2+b^2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vitani11
Awesome. That helps a lot. Can I write ∑⟨em|f⟩⟨fn|em⟩ = ∑⟨em|f⟩⟨f|em⟩ = ∑|⟨em|f⟩|2? At least if I can make an argument for fn = f. I think that is what needs to be done at least because that is the final answer for the first part of the equation.
 
⟨fn| = Σamn|em⟩ this I know. So therefore is its conjugate |fn⟩ equal to Σamn⟨em|?
 
Last edited:
Vitani11 said:
⟨fn| = Σamn|em⟩ this I know. So therefore is its conjugate |fn⟩ equal to Σamn⟨em|?
I would recommend against using the word 'conjugate' in relation to the vector ##|f_n\rangle##. It is natural to talk about the conjugate of the function ##f##, which we denote by ##f^*##, but one doesn't normally talk about the conjugates of vectors, and in most cases the idea of the 'conjugate of a vector' is either meaningless, or means something different from what is intended here. With vectors, one talks about duals. The dual of ##|f\rangle## is ##\langle f|##.

This may seem picky, as in this context it is natural to identify the function ##f## with the vector ##|f\rangle##, but the differences can become important as one goes deeper into Hilbert Space territory. Also, since we are going to all the trouble of treating it as a vector by writing the bar and ket symbols around it, we might as well use vector terminology to refer to it.

Having got that preamble out of the way' let's look at your rephrased question: 'is ##\sum_m a^m{}_n|e_m\rangle## the dual of ##\sum_m a^m{}_n\langle e_m|##?'

To answer that, let's think about this
$$\sum_m a^m{}_n|e_m\rangle
=\sum_m |a^m{}_n\,e_m\rangle$$
and the dual of this is
$$\sum_m \langle a^m{}_n\,e_m|$$
What happens to the coefficients ##a^m{}_n## when we take them outside of that bra?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vitani11
If you take the amn out of the bra you will only have a basis and some scalar... so it will give you the sum over some scalar from n to m, but if it is a coefficient it doesn't change. Therefore amn is simply a and would then be able to be taken out of the whole summation. I don't know - can you do that? but then you would get a sum over all basis vectors which just sounds funny without components until you introduce the amn again. Sorry, this might have sounded ridiculous.
 
Vitani11 said:
but if it is a coefficient it doesn't change
That depends on whether the vector space is over the Real or the Complex numbers. Which one is it in this case?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vitani11
Okay, so if the vector space is over real numbers it does not change but for a vector space over complex numbers the coefficient changes? Can you explain how this is? If I sum over all components of a vector in the complex plane the coefficient changes because the coefficient is itself a basis... As in there is one component which is real and one which is imaginary for the basis of the complex plane
 
Vitani11 said:
Okay, so if the vector space is over real numbers it does not change but for a vector space over complex numbers the coefficient changes? Can you explain how this is?
Using ##*## to denote conjugate for scalars and dual for vectors, we have
$$|\alpha v\rangle^*=\Big(\alpha|v\rangle\Big)^*=\alpha^*|v\rangle^*=\alpha^*\langle v|$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vitani11

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K