Brane world=non-compact extra dimensions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between brane world scenarios and non-compact extra dimensions in theoretical physics. It establishes that a 3-brane exists within a 10-dimensional bulk, which can be non-compact if the brane is in motion. The necessity for a finite size of the bulk to achieve macroscopic gravity is emphasized. Various models, including those proposed by Randall and Sundrum, explore both finite and infinite extra dimensions, with some papers suggesting dimensions beyond the commonly referenced 10 or 11.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of brane world scenarios
  • Familiarity with extra dimensions in theoretical physics
  • Knowledge of Randall-Sundrum models
  • Concept of macroscopic gravity in higher-dimensional theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Randall-Sundrum model and its implications for extra dimensions
  • Explore the concept of non-compact extra dimensions in string theory
  • Investigate the effects of brane motion on gravitational forces
  • Study the implications of varying the number of spacetime dimensions in theoretical models
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and students interested in advanced concepts of higher-dimensional theories and their implications for gravity and spacetime structure.

arivero
Gold Member
Messages
3,481
Reaction score
187
Just wondering. All this stuff of the brane world, where spacetime is a 3-brane inside a 10 dim world... is not the same than telling that we want to use non compact extra dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you've got a braneworld scenario where the 3D brane is moving through the bulk then yes, the bulk is non-compact.
 
cristo said:
If you've got a braneworld scenario where the 3D brane is moving through the bulk then yes, the bulk is non-compact.

I was thinking so. On other hand, in order to have macroscopic gravity I imagine they need some finite "size" of the bulk.
 
arivero said:
I was thinking so. On other hand, in order to have macroscopic gravity I imagine they need some finite "size" of the bulk.

There are different models, some with finite extra dimensions, some with infinite extra dimensions (the first two papers of Randall and Sundrum propose on of each type).
And by the way, in brane world papers they don't necessarily assume that the total number of spacetime dimensions is 10 or 11. In the papers by RS, they simply postulated a fifth dimension. Some other works consider 6 dimensions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K