Breaking Hamiltonian of a particle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Manojg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Particle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the breakdown of the Hamiltonian for a particle, specifically the \(\lambda^{0}\), produced in high-energy nuclear collisions. The Hamiltonian is expressed as \(\hat{H} = \hat{H}_{S} + \hat{H}_{EM} + \hat{H}_{W}\), where \(\hat{H}_{S}\) represents the Strong Hamiltonian, \(\hat{H}_{EM}\) the electromagnetic interactions, and \(\hat{H}_{W}\) the weak interactions. The particle's decay modes, \(\lambda \rightarrow p \pi^{-}\) and \(\lambda \rightarrow n \pi^{0}\), are identified as weak decays influenced by the weak Hamiltonian. The discussion confirms that while the particle is produced via strong interactions, all Hamiltonians contribute to its evolution over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with particle physics, specifically strong and weak interactions
  • Knowledge of decay processes in particle physics
  • Experience with unitary operators in quantum theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of unitary operators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the principles of strong and weak interactions in particle physics
  • Research the decay modes of baryons and their associated Hamiltonians
  • Learn about the electromagnetic interactions in particle decay processes
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in particle physics, quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the interactions governing particle decay processes.

Manojg
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I have a fundamental question about breaking the Hamiltonian. Here is the description:

Suppose a particle, \lambda^{0}, is produced in a high energy nuclear collision with proton beam. It is produced by strong interaction, and it has fixed energy (can be obtained from its momentum and mass). Its propagation with time is given by unitary operator.

\hat{U}(t, 0) = exp(-i\hat{H}t)

The momentum that it got is created by physics involving strong interaction during the collision. So, the Hamiltonian is Strong Hamiltonian, \hat{H}_{S}.

This \lambda^{0} decays via weak interaction. I have seen in books that its Hamiltonian can be break into strong, electromagnetic and weak part, \hat{H} = \hat{H}_{S} + \hat{H}_{EM} + \hat{H}_{W}. How other Hamiltonians come here?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Hamiltonian appearing in your expression is the general Hamiltonian describing all the interactions that influence the evolution of the particle. While it might be created via a strong interaction, it subsequently evolves according to all allowed interactions; for example, it might radiate a Z_0 or photon.
 
bapowell said:
The Hamiltonian appearing in your expression is the general Hamiltonian describing all the interactions that influence the evolution of the particle. While it might be created via a strong interaction, it subsequently evolves according to all allowed interactions; for example, it might radiate a Z_0 or photon.

Major decay mode of \lambda are \lambda \rightarrow p \pi^{-} \text{and} ~\lambda \rightarrow n \pi^{0}. These are weak decays, and \hat{H}_{EM} and \hat{H}_{W} are reffered in these cases.
 
Manojg said:
Major decay mode of \lambda are \lambda \rightarrow p \pi^{-} \text{and} ~\lambda \rightarrow n \pi^{0}. These are weak decays, and \hat{H}_{EM} and \hat{H}_{W} are reffered in these cases.
Right. And they're included in the full Hamiltonian, correct? I think I'm misunderstanding your question.
 
Manojg said:
The momentum that it got is created by physics involving strong interaction during the collision. So, the Hamiltonian is Strong Hamiltonian, \hat{H}_{S}.
This is just an approximation. The other parts of the full hamiltonian are present during the production, too, but their influence on the production is small as the strong force is much stronger than the electroweak stuff.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K