Understanding Spinor's Helicity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kelly0303
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helicity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the Dirac Hamiltonian, helicity, and spin measurements in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the implications of helicity as a simultaneous observable with energy and the conditions under which spin can be measured alongside energy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the Dirac Hamiltonian commutes with the helicity operator but not with the z component of the spin operator, leading to confusion about simultaneous observables.
  • Another participant suggests that while the logic appears sound, the scenario may not be practically useful due to the presence of other significant directions, such as a magnetic field.
  • A later reply questions the ability to measure both spin and energy simultaneously, emphasizing that the non-commutation of their operators typically prevents such measurements.
  • Another participant clarifies that one can measure the projection of spin along the direction of motion, asserting that calling this direction z does not alter the situation, and suggests that the Hamiltonian and ##S_z## operator commute under specific conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of helicity and the conditions for measuring spin and energy simultaneously. There is no consensus on the practical utility of the scenario presented or the interpretation of the measurements involved.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the choice of coordinate systems and the implications of non-commuting operators in quantum mechanics. The discussion highlights the complexity of measuring observables in different contexts.

kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! The free Dirac hamiltonian doesn't commute with the z component of the spin operator ##S_z##, but it commutes with the helicity operator ##h=S\cdot\hat{p}##. This means one can know at the same time the energy and helicity of a particle, but not its spin along the z-axis. I am a bit confused about this. One can measure the momentum of a free particle and hence get its energy. So energy and momentum are simultaneous observables for a free particle. But so is helicity, too. So if I know the momentum of the particle, and choose my z axis to be in that direction, and I know it's helicity, too, don't I know (by the definition of helicity) the spin of the particle along the z, axis i.e. ##S_z##? What is wrong with my logic? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I can tell there is nothing wrong, this is just not very useful for analysing any interesting situation, where you would usually have some other significant direction that dictates how you want to choose your coordinate system. For example a magnetic field in some direction, that you might want to choose to be the z direction rather than the direction of motion.
 
Dr.AbeNikIanEdL said:
As far as I can tell there is nothing wrong, this is just not very useful for analysing any interesting situation, where you would usually have some other significant direction that dictates how you want to choose your coordinate system. For example a magnetic field in some direction, that you might want to choose to be the z direction rather than the direction of motion.
I am not sure I understand. In this situation I gave (which indeed is not very useful in practice), I am able (if my logic is correct) to measure the spin and energy of the particle at the same time. But their operators don't commute. Shouldn't it be impossible to measure both, no matter how I set up the axis? For example, in the momentum position case, no matter what system I choose, or how I place my axis (or what I do whatsoever) I will never be able to precisely measure both. Why could I do that here?
 
No, you are able to measure the projection of the spin along the direction of motion of the particle. Calling that direction z does not really change anything. If you go through the math you will see that Hamiltonian and ##S_z## operator do commute if ##p_x=p_y=0## (which is just a special case of saying that helicity commutes with the Hamiltonian).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K