Breaking news about twin prime conjecture.

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter caffeinemachine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture News Prime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent discussion centers on a potential breakthrough regarding the twin prime conjecture, specifically highlighting a new result that asserts there are infinitely many pairs of prime numbers, albeit not necessarily twin primes. The primes in these pairs can be as far apart as 70 million, which raises questions about the existence of a finite number \( n \) such that infinitely many primes exist within \( n \) units of each other. While there is optimism about reducing this gap, the feasibility of achieving a distance of just 2 remains uncertain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of prime numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with the twin prime conjecture
  • Basic knowledge of number theory concepts
  • Awareness of cardinality and infinite sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest findings on the twin prime conjecture
  • Explore the implications of prime gaps in number theory
  • Study the concept of cardinality in set theory
  • Investigate methods for proving conjectures in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in advanced topics in prime number theory and the twin prime conjecture.

Mathematics news on Phys.org
From what I understood, this is not a proof of the Twin Prime Conjecture itself. The result states that there are infinitely many pairs of primes, but these primes are not twins, or siblings, or even cousins. They can be 70 million apart. In Russian, such relatives are called "seventh water on a kissel" (don't ask me why). But previously it was not known whether there is any finite number $n$ such that there are infinitely many pairs of primes at most $n$ apart. There is hope of reducing the 70 million number, but it is not clear how hard it would be to reduce it all the way to 2.
 
For me 70 million is still more like infinity.
 
mathmaniac said:
For me 70 million is still more like infinity.

As one of my professors said, in relation to the cardinality of the Monster group, "It's cheating to call that finite."
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
From what I understood, this is not a proof of the Twin Prime Conjecture itself. The result states that there are infinitely many pairs of primes, but these primes are not twins, or siblings, or even cousins. They can be 70 million apart. In Russian, such relatives are called "seventh water on a kissel" (don't ask me why). But previously it was not known whether there is any finite number $n$ such that there are infinitely many pairs of primes at most $n$ apart. There is hope of reducing the 70 million number, but it is not clear how hard it would be to reduce it all the way to 2.

You are right. Although the title of the article says 'First Proof of TPC'

- - - Updated - - -

I think 70 million is same as 2 for analysts.
 
caffeinemachine said:
I think 70 million is same as 2 for analysts.

Agreed :rolleyes:
 
mathmaniac said:
For me 70 million is still more like infinity.

I can assure you that 70 million is still infinitely smaller than infinity.
 
Also, we can assure that the infinite $\aleph_0$ is still infinitely smaller than the infinite $2^{\aleph_0}$. :)
 
Pick any infinite set with any cardinality greater than Aleph Null and call that infinite set S.

The Powerset of S has larger cardinality than S itself and therefore higher level of infinity. Repeat the process ad infinitim (what's going to stop you?) to see that the increasing levels of infinity are infinite.

For any given infinity there is always a higher infinity.

It is amazing what you can accomplish simply by asking your students to sit down.

:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K