C-Parity Oddity of Magnetic Current in SU(2) Yang-Mills Theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Leonid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qcd Yang-mills
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the properties of magnetic current in the context of SU(2) Yang-Mills theory, specifically its behavior under C-parity transformations. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical formulations, and related concepts in quantum field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Leonid asserts that the magnetic current must be C-parity odd in SU(2) theory, suggesting that under C-parity transformation, the magnetic current changes sign.
  • Another participant proposes that the magnetic current is a pseudovector, which leads to its sign change under parity and subsequently under charge conjugation due to CPT invariance.
  • A further contribution relates the behavior of the magnetic current to generalized Maxwell's equations, arguing that if charge changes sign under C, then the electric field must also change sign, implying that the magnetic current is odd under C if it is a good symmetry.
  • Some posts diverge into a discussion about the beta function in QCD, addressing its role in the context of asymptotic freedom and the behavior of coupling constants in quantum field theories.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of C-parity for magnetic current, with some supporting the idea of it being C-parity odd and others introducing related concepts from QCD that do not directly address the original question. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific implications of these properties.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of magnetic current and its mathematical representation, which may not be universally accepted. There are also unresolved connections between the properties of magnetic current and the broader implications in quantum field theory.

Leonid
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Why a magnetic current obviously must be C-
parity odd in the (exact) SU(2) theory? (C^{-1} J_M C=-J_M).
Best regard. Leonid
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Leonid said:
Why a magnetic current obviously must be C-
parity odd in the (exact) SU(2) theory? (C^{-1} J_M C=-J_M).
Best regard. Leonid

Just a wild guess as a source for further discussion:

1) the magnetic current is a pseudovector since it is the curl of the dual SU(2) field tensor
2) thus it changes sign under PT
3) due to CPT invariance it also changes sign under C

Don't know if this is correct.
 
It also follows from the generalized Maxwell's equations with magnetic monopoles. Gauss's law reads [tex]\nabla\cdot\vec{E}=\rho[/tex]. Under C, charge changes sign and since derivatives don't care about C, it must be that [tex]\vec{E}[/tex] also changes sign. Applying this rule to the generalized Faraday law [tex]\nabla\times\vec{E}=J_M + \ldots[/tex], it must be that the magnetic current is also odd if C is a good symmetry.
 
Hi:

I have heard that in QCD, there is something called the beta function, How is that function usefull and does that have to do with the asymptotic freedom of quarks?
 
ghery said:
Hi:

I have heard that in QCD, there is something called the beta function, How is that function usefull and does that have to do with the asymptotic freedom of quarks?

In any interacting quantum field theory, there is a beta function - this is the function that explains how a coupling constant varies with the energy you measure it.

For example: consider the electric charge of an electron. It turns out that this number depends on the energy you are probing the electron with. The reason in that in quantum field theory, you can make particle-antiparticle pairs and this has the effect of "screening" the charge. As you probe at higher and higher energies (shorter and shorter distances) you are able to cut through more of that "quantum interference" and so the measured charge increases. The beta function is a way of quantifying that idea.

Now on to QCD: it turns out (due to the nature of nonabelian gauge theories) that QCD has the opposite effect - it has ANTI-screening. So as you probe at higher and higher energies (smaller and smaller distances) the measured charge actually DEcreases! This is the phenomenon known as "asymptotic freedom."

As to how it's useful: it is absolutely VITAL! You cannot do QCD computations without it (and get the right answer!).

Hope that helps!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K