Can virtual particles turn into real particles? (news about new study)

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cosmanino2050
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

SUMMARY

The recent study at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) demonstrates that virtual quark/antiquark pairs in the quantum vacuum can be converted into real, observable particles through high-energy collisions. Specifically, strange quark/antiquark pairs within lambda and antilambda particles emerge as entangled pairs retaining spin correlations from vacuum fluctuations. This provides direct experimental evidence that quantum vacuum fluctuations produce real matter under sufficient energy conditions. The findings clarify that it is the virtual quarks in the vacuum, energized by particle collisions, that materialize as real quarks, not photons or gluons directly transforming into quarks.

PREREQUISITES

  • Quantum Field Theory (QFT) vacuum fluctuations
  • Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) experimental setup
  • Quark-antiquark entanglement and spin correlation
  • Particle collision energy thresholds for particle creation

NEXT STEPS

  • Study quantum vacuum fluctuations and their role in particle physics
  • Analyze entanglement properties of quark-antiquark pairs in QFT
  • Review experimental techniques used at RHIC for detecting lambda/antilambda particles
  • Explore energy transfer mechanisms from collisions to virtual particle materialization

USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, quantum field theorists, researchers studying quantum vacuum phenomena, and science communicators explaining quantum matter creation processes.

cosmanino2050
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
If virtual particles are merely mathematical tools used to calculate quantum field interactions, how should we interpret the news about the recent study claiming that these virtual particles can actually be converted into real, observable matter?
https://www.newsweek.com/physicists-get-peek-how-matter-born-from-nothing-11464591
If virtual particles are merely mathematical tools used to calculate quantum field interactions, how should we interpret the news about the recent study claiming that these virtual particles can actually be converted into real, observable matter?

They say the following in the article:
"This suggested that the strange quark/antiquark particles in the lambda/antilambda particles emerged as an entangled pair—retaining a spin linkage that was established in the vacuum.
According to the researchers, the energy of the particle collisions in the RHIC gives the "virtual" particles the energy boost they need to transform into "real" particles.

"This is the first time we’ve been able to see directly that the quarks that make up these particles are coming from the vacuum—it’s a direct window into the quantum vacuum fluctuations," said Tu."

Do they mean that the quarks which were in the vacuum virtual turned into real particles or the photons or the gluons which were virtual particles turned into real quarks?

https://www.newsweek.com/physicists-get-peek-how-matter-born-from-nothing-11464591
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
cosmanino2050 said:
how should we interpret the news about the recent study claiming that these virtual particles can actually be converted into real, observable matter?
It is Newsweek doing their best to describe what is going on in to a non-technical audience using non-technical math-free language.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy and mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K