Calculate a spin state as a function of the base spin states

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating spin states as linear combinations of base spin states |u⟩ (up) and |d⟩ (down), which are orthogonal. It establishes that any spin state |A⟩ can be expressed as |A⟩ = αu |u⟩ + αd |d⟩, with probabilities Pu and Pd determined by the coefficients αu and αd. The total probability must equal 1, leading to the normalization condition αu* αu + αd* αd = 1. The discussion also introduces spin states |r⟩ and |l⟩ along the x-axis, demonstrating that these states can be expressed similarly, with specific coefficients derived from the conditions of orthogonality and normalization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin states and their representations.
  • Familiarity with linear algebra concepts, particularly vector spaces and orthogonality.
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their conjugates in quantum state calculations.
  • Basic grasp of probability theory as applied to quantum measurements.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of quantum state coefficients in linear combinations, focusing on normalization conditions.
  • Learn about the implications of phase ambiguity in quantum mechanics and how it affects spin state measurements.
  • Explore the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics, particularly the role of Hilbert spaces in representing quantum states.
  • Investigate the application of the Pauli matrices in describing spin states along different axes.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the mathematical representation of spin states and their measurements.

Luke_Mtt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Hi everyone,
I recently started approaching for the first time to the quantum mechanics field by reading the book of Susskind and Friedman "Quantum Mechanics, The Theoretical Minimum" but I couldn't figure how the authors can express some spin state in function of two (orthogonal) base spin states (II chapter).
Practically it is said that, given two spin states |u⟩ (up) and |d⟩ (down) - which are the spin measured along the +z and -z semiaxes - such that they are orthogonal ( ⟨u|d⟩ = ⟨d|u⟩ = 0), it is possible to write any other spin states using a linear combination of these two (because they are a base of the states' vector space). So it is:

|A⟩ = αu |u⟩ + αd |d⟩ = ⟨u|A⟩ |u⟩ + ⟨d|A⟩ |d⟩

It is then said that given a spin state |A⟩, the probability to measure up or down (|u⟩ and |d⟩) spin states are:

Pu = ⟨A|u⟩ ⟨u|A⟩ = ⟨u|A⟩* ⟨u|A⟩ = αu* αu
Pd = ⟨A|d⟩ ⟨d|A⟩ = ⟨d|A⟩* ⟨d|A⟩ = αd* αd

(where x* is the complex conjugate)
Then, the total probability is 1 so that:

αu* αu + αd* αd = 1.

Which is equivalent to say that |A⟩ is normalized to the unit (⟨A|A⟩ = 1)

Then it is introduced another vector cuple considered as another base. This two vectors, |r⟩ (right) and |l⟩ (left) represent the spin state along the +x and -x semiaxes. Quoting verbatim the book it is said that "If a spin state |A⟩ prepares the initial state |r⟩, and an instrument that stores the spin value is rotated (from |r⟩ because it has prepared it) to measure the z axe's spin (σz), the probability to obtain up or down is the same (because the x axe is perpendicular to the z one), so it must be: αu* αu = αd* αd = ½". Then the authors state that a vector which satisfy this conditions is, for example:

|r⟩ = αu |u⟩ + αd |d⟩ = ⟨u|r⟩ |u⟩ + ⟨d|r⟩ |d⟩ = 1/√2 |u⟩ + 1/√2 |d⟩

After, they say, in addition to a phase ambiguity (please, can you make me understand this point too, because I couldn't figure out what phase ambiguity is), |r⟩ and |l⟩ must satisfy ⟨l|r⟩ = ⟨r|l⟩ = 0 too because of the fact of being a base of the vector space. They then say that this conditions bind the |l⟩ vector to take the form:

|l⟩ = αu |u⟩ + αd |d⟩ = ⟨u|l⟩ |u⟩ + ⟨d|l⟩ |d⟩ = 1/√2 |u⟩ - 1/√2 |d⟩

Then they repeat almost the same procedure for the y axe. So, calling |i⟩ (in) and |o⟩ (out) the spin state along the +y and -y semiaxes it is possible to use this two spin state as a base, provided that ⟨i|o⟩ = ⟨o|i⟩ = 0. Then it is known that:

αu* αu = ⟨u|o⟩* ⟨u|o⟩ = ⟨o|u⟩ ⟨u|o⟩ = ½ // αu* αu in function of o
αd* αd = ⟨d|o⟩* ⟨d|o⟩ = ⟨o|d⟩ ⟨d|o⟩ = ½ // αd* αd in function of o
αu* αu = ⟨u|i⟩* ⟨u|i⟩ = ⟨i|u⟩ ⟨u|i⟩ = ½ // αu* αu in function of i
αd* αd = ⟨d|i⟩* ⟨d|i⟩ = ⟨i|d⟩ ⟨d|i⟩ = ½ // αd* αd in function of i

And also because y is orthogonal both at z and at x it mus be

αr* αr = ⟨r|o⟩* ⟨r|o⟩ = ⟨o|r⟩ ⟨r|o⟩ = ½ // αr* αr in function of o
αl* αl = ⟨l|o⟩* ⟨l|o⟩ = ⟨o|l⟩ ⟨l|o⟩ = ½ // αl* αl in function of o
αr* αr = ⟨r|i⟩* ⟨r|i⟩ = ⟨i|r⟩ ⟨r|i⟩ = ½ // αr* αr in function of i
αl* αl = ⟨l|i⟩* ⟨l|i⟩ = ⟨i|l⟩ ⟨l|i⟩ = ½ // αo* αo in function of i

So, they say, apart from the phase ambiguity, the vectors for |i⟩ and |o⟩ which satisfies this conditions are:

|i⟩ = αu |u⟩ + αd |d⟩ = ⟨u|i⟩ |u⟩ + ⟨d|i⟩ |d⟩ = 1/√2 |u⟩ + i/√2 |d⟩
|l⟩ = αu |u⟩ + αd |d⟩ = ⟨u|o⟩ |u⟩ + ⟨d|o⟩ |d⟩ = 1/√2 |u⟩ - i/√2 |d⟩

Finally, the thing I couldn't understand, apart from the phase ambiguity, is "how the authors came up with the αu and αd coefficients for |r⟩, |l⟩, |i⟩, |o⟩"? Did they already know that this coefficients would have worked with that specific conditions or there is a process behind this choice? If it is, which calculus do I have to do to derive these coefficients?

P.S. My english is not perfect, so sorry for eventual errors.

Thank you for your time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The phase ambiguity means that you can multiply both coefficients by ##\exp(i\theta)##, where ##\theta## is any angle.

I haven't understood your second question about the coefficients. Do you mean you don't understand how they derived that ##a_{u} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}##?
 
Exactly. Because the authors gave the final equations by saying "this vector can satisfy this particular conditions". But both in |r⟩, |l⟩ and |i⟩, |o⟩ I didn't understand how they have derived the αu and αd coefficients for this four spin states.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K