MHB Calculate Interest on Account: 2.1% per Annum

  • Thread starter Thread starter lave48
  • Start date Start date
lave48
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have an account that pays 2.1% per annum. The amount in the account has varied over the year due to withdrawals. My question is what is the formula for working out the interest due to me over the year? Many thanks in advance Lave48
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Precisely what happens depends upon the policy of the bank. Most likely, and certainly the most exact, would be to deal with individual days. An interest rate of 2.1% per year is 2.1/365= 0.00575% per day. Calculate the interest for each day with the amount of money that day.
 
lave48 said:
I have an account that pays 2.1% per annum. The amount in the account has varied over the year due to withdrawals. My question is what is the formula for working out the interest due to me over the year? Many thanks in advance Lave48
...or calculate the average balance for the year;
multiply result by .021

Example: if av.bal. = 1200, then 1200*.021 = 25.20
Enough for a 12pack of beer!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top