MHB Calculate Present Value of 10-Year Lease w/ OCC & Variable Rental

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the present value of a 10-year lease with annual payments that increase by 2% each year, starting at £20, with an opportunity cost of capital (OCC) of 10%. The original poster initially calculated a present value of -£23.88, while the book states it should be £132.51. Participants suggest that the error likely stems from incorrect data entry into the calculator. A corrected formula is provided, emphasizing the importance of accurate input for the calculation. The conversation concludes with the poster confirming the use of the correct figures resolved the issue.
logicandtruth
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
Hi all

Trying to improve my level of maths and would like some help with the below question please.

A 10-year lease with annual rental payments to be made at the end of each year, with the rent increasing by 2% each year. If the first year rent is £20 and the OCC is 10% per year, what is the Present value of the lease?

The formula for present value of a level annuities is below (for a growing interest rate)

View attachment 8227

According to my book the answer should be £132.51, but I get -23.88.

View attachment 8228

Could anyone tell me where I am misinterpreting the formula?
 

Attachments

  • PV Formula.PNG
    PV Formula.PNG
    2.5 KB · Views: 125
  • PV Formula Answer.PNG
    PV Formula Answer.PNG
    4.7 KB · Views: 107
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Book is correct. Are you using a calculator?
You're probably entering the data wrongly...we can't tell...
Try it this way:
u = (1.02/1.10)^10
v = .10 - .02

PV = 20*(1 - u) / v
 
Yes it works I must have been using the incorrect figure with my calculator.

Many thanks
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top