MHB Calculate Volume of Truncated Square Pyramid | Yahoo Answers

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volume of a truncated square pyramid using integral calculus. The method involves slicing the pyramid into horizontal square slices and integrating to find the total volume. The volume of each slice is expressed as a function of the slice's dimensions and the angle of repose. By applying the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, the final volume formula is derived. Using the provided dimensions, the calculated volume is approximately 47855.22 cm³.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Truncated Pyramid Question?

If the angle of repose is given as 32 degrees, the height is 18cm and the top square is 20*20cm, can I calculate the volume?

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Sam G,

One method we can use to calculate the volume of the pyramid is to use a technique from integral calculus called volumes by slicing. We will slice the pyramid into horizontal square slices and then add the slices by integrating.

I would choose to orient the cross-section of the pyramid as follows:

View attachment 1132

We can now see that the volume of an arbitrary slice, a square slice of side length $s$ and thickness $dy$ is:

$$dV=s^2\,dy$$

where:

$$s=w+2x=w+2\cot(\theta)y$$

and so we have:

$$dV=\left(w+2\cot(\theta)y \right)^2\,dy= \left(w^2+4w\cot(\theta)y+4\cot^2(\theta)y^2 \right)\,dy$$

Now, summing the slices by integration, we find:

$$V=\int_0^h w^2+4w\cot(\theta)y+4\cot^2(\theta)y^2\,dy$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain:

$$V=\left[w^2y+2w\cot(\theta)y^2+\frac{4}{3}\cot^2(\theta)y^3 \right]_0^h=w^2h+2w\cot(\theta)h^2+\frac{4}{3}\cot^2( \theta)h^3$$

$$V=\frac{h}{3}\left(4\cot^2( \theta)h^2+6w\cot(\theta)h+3w^2 \right)$$

Using the given data:

$$h=18\text{ cm},\,w=20\text{ cm},\,\theta=32^{\circ}$$

we find:

$$V\approx47855.220519615943\text{ cm}^3$$
 

Attachments

  • samg.jpg
    samg.jpg
    4.4 KB · Views: 114
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K