Calculating a straight line within a sphere

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the geographical direction and inclination of a line drawn between two points on a sphere, specifically in the context of a fictional project. The participants explore concepts of 3D geometry, spherical trigonometry, and great circles, with a focus on how latitude and longitude affect these calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the inclination of the line segment between two points on a sphere depends on latitude, with one suggesting that longitude does not play a role in determining inclination.
  • Others argue that longitude is indeed significant, particularly when the two points share the same longitude, as this affects the inclination and direction of the line connecting them.
  • A participant describes the geometry involved, mentioning that the angles formed by the rays from the Earth's center to the points are crucial for calculating inclination.
  • Another participant suggests using 3D coordinates to find the vector between the two points, which would help determine both the inclination and the compass direction.
  • There is a mention of a specific example where two points have the same longitude, leading to a different inclination than when they differ by 180 degrees.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the role of longitude in inclination calculations, leading to further clarification and corrections of earlier claims.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the role of longitude in determining inclination. While some assert that it is not significant, others provide counterexamples that suggest it is essential. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to calculating the inclination and direction.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of inclination and direction, as well as the need for clear assumptions about the geometry involved. The discussion also highlights the complexity of spherical trigonometry and the potential for different interpretations based on the coordinates used.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
24,460
Reaction score
8,710
This is a fiction project, but the question is about 3D geometry (a bit beyond my HS math skills).

Given two points on a sphere (oh say, hypothetically, the Earth), draw a line from point A through the Earth to Point B.

If I were to stand on point A and point directly at point B, what geographical direction (eg.NNE) would I be pointing and what inclination (eg. 30 degrees down)?

Very rounded numbers (and compass points) are fine.

Point A is 45N 60W
Point B is 60N 100E
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
This is a fiction project, but the question is about 3D geometry (a bit beyond my HS math skills).

Given two points on a sphere (oh say, hypothetically, the Earth), draw a line from point A through the Earth to Point B.

If I were to stand on point A and point directly at point B, what geographical direction (eg.NNE) would I be pointing and what inclination (eg. 30 degrees down)?

Very rounded numbers (and compass points) are fine.

Point A is 45N 60W
Point B is 60N 100E
I haven't thought about the direction, but I have given some thought to the inclination of the line joining the two points.
GCircle.png


Any two points on a sphere lie on a "great circle," as shown in the figure above. For the inclination of line segment ##\overline{AB}##, the longitude plays no role -- only the latitude is important. Point A's latitude is 45° N, and point B's latitude is 60° N, so rays extending from the center of the Earth make angles of 45° and 60°, respectively, with the equator. The triangle shown here is an isosceles triangle whose lower angle is 75°. The angles at A and B are 52.5° each.

If you draw a line at A that is tangent to the great circle, the angle between this tangent and ##\overline{AB}## will be 37.5°, the angle of declination of the line from point A to point B.

I leave the other part of your question to others who might be interested.
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913 said:
This is a fiction project, but the question is about 3D geometry (a bit beyond my HS math skills).

Given two points on a sphere (oh say, hypothetically, the Earth), draw a line from point A through the Earth to Point B.

If I were to stand on point A and point directly at point B, what geographical direction (eg.NNE) would I be pointing and what inclination (eg. 30 degrees down)?

Very rounded numbers (and compass points) are fine.

Point A is 45N 60W
Point B is 60N 100E

Some spherical trigonometry would be of great help. If you have the time and patience to read, take a look at the first chapter of this book.
 
@Mark44: If longitude plays no role, what about this situation?
Point A is 45N 60W
Point B is 60N 60W
Clearly the great circle connecting those has 90 degrees inclination. Your approach only works if the longitude is different by 180 degrees.If in doubt, calculate the 3D coordinates for both points, everything else follows from that.
 
mfb said:
@Mark44: If longitude plays no role, what about this situation?
Point A is 45N 60W
Point B is 60N 60W
Clearly the great circle connecting those has 90 degrees inclination. Your approach only works if the longitude is different by 180 degrees.
The approach I described is only for the inclination of the segment joining the two points, not the distance between them, in which the longitude necessarily plays a role. For the scenario you give, the central angle of the isosceles triangle is 15°, so the base angles are each 82.5°. From this, the angle of declination from A to B is -7.5°.

To find the direction of the segment, I agree that you would need the coordinates (3D rectangular would be easiest, I think) of the two points. From these you could find a vector joining the two points, and from that, find the compass direction from one point to the other.
 
That inclination depends on longitude already. Just with the latitude values, you cannot do anything apart from determining the minimal inclination.
 
mfb said:
That inclination depends on longitude already. Just with the latitude values, you cannot do anything apart from determining the minimal inclination.
After thinking about this some more, I realize you're right. Your example of two points at the same longitude didn't really show this, but if the two points are both on the equator (i.e., same latitude), then the angle of inclination comes solely from the longitude. If the two points are at the same longitude, then only the latitudes come into play. If long./lat. are different for both points, then both have to be used.

My error was in not taking into account that the angles relative to the great circle through the two points can be different from the angles relative to the equatorial plane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K