Calculating Angular Acceleration w/ Torque & Moment of Inertia

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating angular acceleration using torque and moment of inertia, specifically focusing on the relationship expressed in the equation τ = Iα. Participants are exploring the units involved in this calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the units of angular acceleration derived from torque and moment of inertia. Some participants discuss the nature of radians as a unit in this context, questioning the terminology used to describe it.

Discussion Status

Participants have engaged in a productive dialogue regarding the units of angular acceleration and the terminology surrounding it. There is an ongoing exploration of the concept of "unitless" versus "dimensionless" units, indicating a collaborative effort to refine understanding.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on ensuring clarity in the definitions and units used in angular motion, with some participants questioning the assumptions about the nature of radians in this context.

SDTK
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



this is a question just to help with my understanding: ...

when Torque (kg m^2/s^2) and the Moment of Inertia (kg m^2) are known and used to find angular acceleration, ... T(net)/I, are the units for the resulting acceleration rad/s^2

Thanks :-)

Homework Equations


##\tau = I \alpha##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B] Example:
t = 12 kg m^2/s^2
I = 3.00 kg m^2

angular acceleration = torque/I = 12 kg m^2/s^2 / 3.00 kg m^2 = 4 units(?) / s^2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Angular acceleration is given in radians per second squared ##(rad/s^2)##.

The radian is sort of a "unitless unit" that appears and disappears as required when working with angular quantities. It's based on a ratio of lengths from the unit circle, where an angle is defined via the arclength along the circle divided by the radius length. It serves to distinguish a quantity as being angular in nature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SDTK
thank you! :-)
 
gneill said:
unitless unit
How about "dimensionless unit"?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SDTK
haruspex said:
How about "dimensionless unit"?
Sure! That's probably better nomenclature. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SDTK

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K