Calculating Cell Potential Using Nernst Equation for Ag+ Voltaic Cell

  • Thread starter Thread starter pzona
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nernst equation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the cell potential for a voltaic cell involving silver ions (Ag+) using the Nernst equation. The cell consists of a copper anode in a CuSO4 solution and a silver cathode in a 0.1M AgNO3 solution, with a KNO3 salt bridge. The measured potential for the cell is -0.390V, and the oxidation potential for the copper half-reaction is +0.34V. The user seeks clarification on whether to calculate the standard cell potential (Eocell) or the actual cell potential (Ecell), ultimately determining that Eocell is necessary for their analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Nernst equation and its components
  • Knowledge of electrochemical cell components, including anodes and cathodes
  • Familiarity with standard reduction potentials
  • Basic concepts of molarity and concentration in solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Nernst equation in detail, focusing on its application in electrochemistry
  • Learn how to interpret standard reduction potential tables for various half-reactions
  • Explore the concept of electron transfer in electrochemical reactions
  • Investigate the effects of concentration on cell potential in electrochemical cells
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrochemistry, laboratory technicians working with voltaic cells, and educators teaching the principles of electrochemical reactions.

pzona
Messages
234
Reaction score
0
This problem is homework from a lab I did yesterday. Normally I would just ask my TA, but since it's homework I can't. I could email him, but I feel like I'll probably get a faster response if I post this here

Homework Statement


Use the Nernst equation to determine the cell potential for the cell involving Ag+. This is from a voltaic cell I made using a copper anode and CuSO4 solution and a silver cathode and AgNO3, with a KNO3 solution as a salt bridge. I used a multimeter to calculate the cell potentials for other cells I built (using other metal cathodes and relevant solutions) because their concentrations were 1M, standard conditions. The AgNO3 was 0.1M so I need to use the Nernst equation to calculate cell potential (assuming all other factors, ex. temperature were standard).

Measured potential for the cell: -0.390V
Given oxidation potential for the copper half reaction: +0.34V


Homework Equations


The Nernst Equation:

E_{cell} = E^{o}_{cell} + 0.0592V(mol)/n * log_{10}Q

Half reaction at the cathode:

Ag+(aq) + e- -> Ag(s), since [Ag+] = 0.1M, Q and n will both be 0.1

The Attempt at a Solution


Honestly, this comes down to me not understanding what the terms mean. I just started electrochemistry and I haven't been able to find a decent explanation of the terms online.

I'm not sure whether I need to solve for E^{o}_{cell} (I did and got -0.982V) or E_{cell} (I got +0.202V). Solving for E^{o}_{cell} makes more sense, given my answer, since I know that silver is a poor reducing agent. It should give a negative answer of fairly high magnitude in relation to the other cells, which it did.

Basically what I'm asking is, E^{o}_{cell} is the quantity I'm looking for...right? Is E_{cell} the measured potential for a cell under non-standard conditions? Also, is my answer for E^{o}_{cell} of a reasonable magnitude? Thanks.

EDIT: Looks like my subscripts were messed up somehow. I'm pretty sure you'll be able to figure out what I meant though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you are looking for Ecell of a silver half cell. E0cell you can take from standard potential tables.

Q is 0.1, that's OK, but n is not.

Once you have Ecell of silver half cell, you can calculate E for whole cell.

--
methods
 
Okay, so for the whole cell, n would be 1.1 mol then? My lab manual says that n is the total amount (in moles) of electrons transferred, so I just add the 0.1 to the 1 from the CuSO4, correct?
 
No, n is amount of electrons transferred in the half cell reaction. It is always an integer.

--
 
Ah okay, looking back on it that makes a lot more sense than what I have. Thanks a lot for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K