Calculating Clebsch Gordon Coefficients

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficients
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating Clebsch-Gordon coefficients for the coupling of angular momenta, specifically for the case of \(1/2 \otimes 1 = 3/2 \oplus 1/2\). The original poster expresses confusion regarding the notation and the process involved in deriving these coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the notation used by the original poster and its potential confusion. Some suggest looking up coefficients in a table rather than deriving them. Others reflect on their past experiences with similar calculations and the challenges posed by the notation.

Discussion Status

There is a mix of confusion and attempts to clarify the notation and process. Some participants have offered insights into starting points for the calculation, while others express uncertainty about the original poster's approach. No explicit consensus has been reached, but there are indications of productive dialogue regarding the methods involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the properties of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients and the specific states involved in the product space. There is mention of potential confusion stemming from the notation used in the original problem statement.

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the Clebsch Gordon coefficients of 1/2 \otimes 1 = 3/2 \oplus 1/2

Homework Equations



We have some properties of the CG coefficients which might be useful:

1) they are nonzero only if j is between j1-j2 and j1+j2
2) m = m1+m2 for nonzero coefficients
3) they are real

The Attempt at a Solution



I am horribly confused. I know that the CG coefficients are given as the coefficients in the expansion

|j m, j_1 j_2 \rangle = \sum_{m_1} \sum_{m_2} | j_1 m_1, j_2 m_2 \rangle \langle j_1 m_1, j_2 m_2| jm, j_1 j_2\rangle

or

\langle j_1 m_1, j_2 m_2 | j m \rangle

and I know that the possible |j m j1 j2> states are for the product space with j1 = 1, j2 = 1/2:

| \frac{3}{2} \frac{3}{2} ,1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle, | \frac{3}{2} \frac{1}{2},1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle, | \frac{3}{2} \frac{-1}{2} ,1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle, | \frac{3}{2}\frac{-3}{2} ,1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle, | \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{2} ,1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle, | \frac{1}{2} \frac{-1}{2} ,1 \frac{1}{2} \rangle

but I don't understand what on Earth to do or where to even start. Any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You usually just look them up in a table. I hope your assignment doesn't want you to actually derive them. Also, I am a bit confused on your notation in the first sentence.
 
Yes, I think the notation is what's confusing me. I computed some of the coefficients a couple of years ago in an undergraduate class, but I've never seen this notation. I guess what the author means is to find the coefficients for all the basis kets in the product space where j1 = 1/2, j2 =1. There are (2*j1+1)*(2j2+1)=6 such kets.

I actually have figured it out - but boy, I think Shankar has weird notation...

All one needs do is to start with the maximal possible z component, and apply lowering operators for each given j value, along with applying orthogonality and normalization conditions. A bit tricky but doable...
 
Start with the | 3/2\mbox{ }3/2 \rangle state. You know that it has to correspond to |1/2\mbox{ }1/2; 1\mbox{ }1\rangle. Then apply the lowering operator to get | 3/2\mbox{ }1/2 \rangle, and so on.Edit: Oh sure, figure it out right before I post! ;)
 
Thanks anyway! It's good to know that my solution wasn't just pure nonsense :-)
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K