Calculating Electrostatic Energy for a Uniformly Charged Sphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electrostatic energy of a uniformly charged sphere, which is modeled as a nucleus with a charge Ze distributed within a radius R. Participants are exploring the relationship between the electrostatic energy of the charge distribution and the energy stored in the electric field.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to show the equivalence of two expressions for electrostatic energy: one derived from the charge distribution and the other from the electric field. There are questions about the correct volume element and integration limits, particularly regarding the contributions from inside and outside the sphere.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified discrepancies in their calculations, particularly regarding factors and integration limits. There is ongoing exploration of whether the energy stored in the field outside the sphere should be included, and some guidance has been provided regarding the need to evaluate integrals over all space.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the charge density is zero outside the sphere, which affects the evaluation of the integrals. There is also a discussion about the implications of integrating from the sphere's radius to infinity for the field energy.

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
A sphere of radius R has a unifromly distributed charge Ze inside it (essentially it's a model of a nucleus)

now my tutor worked through the first part of the question with me and we established that the potential inside the sphere was

[itex]\varphi(\mathbf{r})=-\frac{Zer^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 R^3} + \frac{3Ze}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 R}[/itex] and the field inside was [itex]\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})=\frac{Zer}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 R^3} \mathbf{\hat{r}}[/itex]

the question I'm stuck on is showing that the electrostatic energy, [itex]\frac{1}{2} \int dV \rho \varphi[/itex], of the nucleus is equal to the field energy, [itex]\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 \int dV \mathbf{E}^2[/itex].

i took [itex]\rho=\frac{Ze}{\frac{4}{3} \pi R^3}=\frac{3Ze}{4 \pi R^3}[/itex]

and so electrostatic energy is
[itex]\frac{1}{2} \frac{3Z^2e^2}{32 \pi^2 \epsilon_0} \int_{r=0}^R (\frac{3}{R^4}-\frac{r^2}{R^6}) dr \int_{\theta=0}^{\pi} d \theta \int_{\phi=0}^{2 \pi} d \phi = \frac{3 Z^2 e^2}{32 \epsilon_0} [\frac{3}{R^3}-\frac{1}{3R^3}]=\frac{Z^2 e^2}{4 \epsilon_0 R^3}[/itex]

and the field energy is
[itex]\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 \int dV \frac{Z^2 e^2 r^2}{16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0^2 R^6}=\frac{Z^2 e^2}{32 \pi^2 \epsilon_0} \int_{r=0}^R \frac{r^2}{R^6} dr \int_{\theta=0}^{\pi} d \theta \int_{\phi=0}^{2 \pi} d \phi = \frac{Z^2 e^2}{16 \epsilon_0} [\frac{r^3}{3R^6}]_{r=0}^{R}=\frac{Z^2 e^2}{48 \epsilon_0 R^3}[/itex]

clearly I'm out by a factor of 12 but the fact that allt he constants etc are the way they should be hopefully means I'm on the right lines. can anybody help? cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to be using [tex]dV=dr d\theta d\phi[/tex]; which doesn't even have the correct units for a volume element, let alone produce the correct volume when integrated over a sphere! :eek: You might want to reconsider that. :wink:
 
still not getting it.
electrostatic one gives

[itex]\frac{3 Z^2 e^2}{64 \pi^2 \epsilon_0} \int_0^R (\frac{3r^2}{R^4}-\frac{r^4}{R^6}) dr \int_0^{\pi} sin{\theta} d \theta \int_0^{2 \pi} d \phi= \frac{3Z^2 e^2}{32 \pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{1}{R}-\frac{1}{5R}] [-(-1-1)]=\frac{3Z^2 e^2}{16 \pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{4}{5R}] = \frac{3 Z^2 e^2}{20 \pi \epsilon_0 R}[/itex]

and field gives

[itex]\frac{Z^2 e^2}{32 \pi^2 \epsilon_0} \int_0^R \frac{r^4}{R^6} dr \int_0^{\pi} sin{\theta} d \theta \int_0^{2 \pi} d \phi=\frac{Z^2 e^2}{16 \pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{1}{5R}][2] = \frac{Z^2 e^2}{40 \pi \epsilon_0 R}[/itex]

which still don't agree. any further advice? cheers.
 
Doesn't the field outside the sphere also contribute to the energy stored in the field?:wink:
 
does it? i don't really understand what's going on here, could you explain where these two energies come from please?
 
The electrostatic energy is the electric potential energy of all the charges.

Since that energy is precisely what goes into creating the electric field, one expects that the energy stored in the field is equal to the energy of the charge configuration.

The first integral gives the energy of the charge configuration, while the second integral gives the energy stored in the field. Both integrals should be over all of space, but since [itex]\rho=0[/itex] outside the sphere, the first integral need only be evaluated from 0 to R. The electric field on the other hand is not zero outside the sphere, so you need to consider both the field energy inside the sphere as well as the field energy outside the sphere. Wherever there is a non-zero field, there will be some field energy present. When you add up all the field energy, you get the same amount of energy as the energy of the charge distribution.

This means that you need to know what the field is outside the sphere![tex]\frac{1}{2} \int_{\text{all space}} \rho \varphi dV=\frac{1}{2} \int_{\text{inside}} \rho \varphi_{\text{inside}} dV[/tex]

But[tex]\frac{\epsilon_0}{2} \int_{\text{all space}} E^2 dV=\frac{\epsilon_0}{2} \int_{\text{inside}} E^2_{\text{inside}} dV+\frac{\epsilon_0}{2} \int_{\text{outside}} E^2_{\text{outside}} dV[/tex]
 
Last edited:
so my tutor had helped work out the field outside the sphere as [itex]\frac{Ze}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2}[/itex]

however when i put this into the formula we get the following problem

[itex]\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_0 \int dV \frac{Z^2 e^2}{16 \pi^2 \epsilon_0^2 r^4} = \frac{Z^2 e^2}{32 \pi^2 \epsilon_0} \int_0^R \frac{1}{r^2} dr \int_0^{\pi} sin{\theta} d \theta \int_0^{2 \pi} d \phi = \frac{z^2 e^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0} [-\frac{1}{r}]_{r=0}^{r=R}[/itex] and so we're going to get an infinity term are we not?
 
or perhaps this integral should be from R to [itex]\infty[/itex], yes?
 
that works. thanks a lot for your help mate!
 
  • #10
latentcorpse said:
or perhaps this integral should be from R to [itex]\infty[/itex], yes?

Of course--- 0 to R is inside---R to infinity is outside :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K