Calculating Force for Train Wagon Impact on Glass Furnace Door

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fritz_CT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the force exerted by a train wagon impacting a glass furnace door, particularly in the context of using springs for vibration and impact isolation. Participants explore the implications of the units provided (N*m) and the necessary parameters for determining the force involved in the impact.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of the units given (140 N*m), suggesting they may represent energy rather than force, and emphasizes the need to clarify this with the client.
  • Another participant agrees that the units are likely energy (N*m) and suggests that knowing the mass and velocity of the wagon might be sufficient for selecting a spring.
  • A participant provides the mass of the wagon (250 Kg) and its velocity (0.8 m/s), and attempts to calculate the force using momentum and time of impact, proposing a force of 2000 N based on an assumed stopping time of 0.1 seconds.
  • Another participant cautions against assuming the stopping time, noting that a slight change in this assumption could significantly alter the calculated force.
  • One participant suggests starting with the energy units provided by the customer and looking at the spring's force vs. deflection plots to determine an appropriate spring, while still recommending verification of the units.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the units provided and the assumptions regarding the stopping time for the wagon. There is no consensus on the correct approach to calculating the force or the interpretation of the units.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the interpretation of the units (N*m) and the appropriate stopping time for the wagon's impact. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the necessary parameters for accurately determining the force involved.

Fritz_CT
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
HI all

I wonder if someone could help me out here. I run a structure borne noise & vibraton control company and have been passed an enquiry that is little off our usual field. We use a lot of springs in our business. The idea being that if something is vibrating and we support it on something with a significanlty lower natural frequency than the vibration frequency then we get isolation.

The problem we have been given is this:

A train wagon is feeding a glass furnace. The train runs round a track & up to the furnace door. If everything is in sync the door opens as the wagin arrives, it deploys it's load and moves off again. The probl;em is that the door occasionally fails to open and the wagon is hitting the doorcasing a lot of damage. The idea is to use one of our springs as a buffer. The info we have been given is that the wagin hits the door with a force of 140 N m. The problem I have is that I'm not sure whet the units are saying. As i understand them the definition would be 140 N of force acting through a distance of 1 metre along the direction of the force.

What I am trying to do is calculate what the force the wagon hits the door with is in Kg. I can then select a spring with an appropriate spring rate and problem solved. Can anyone translate this to a recognisable unit for me?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
They're doing the engineering equivalent of mixing metaphors. The units are units of energy (N*m) and stating it is a force. The first thing I would do is corner them to nail down what they meant. Did they mean force or energy?
 
The units are units of energy (N*m)

Um, actually I think that's work or maybe in this case it could possibly be torque. Anyway, as Fred stated you need to confront them and figure out what they are trying to tell you. But to pick a spring you don't really need the force that they are hitting the door do you? I would imagine that you only need to know the mass and velocity of the wagon.
 
Thank you for the help. I'll get back to my client and get him to clarify.

Topher, yes I can and probably will calculate the force as a cross check but I'd prefer to be given the value by my client because then he remains responsible for the answer, particularly as we don't always get given the correct input data as it seems in this case. A sorry state of affairs but we live in a litigous world. I wasn't sure what the unit N m was and thought perhaps there was a simple way of getting to a unit I recognised but now I know differently.

Thanks again
 
Topher925 said:
Um, actually I think that's work or maybe in this case it could possibly be torque. Anyway, as Fred stated you need to confront them and figure out what they are trying to tell you. But to pick a spring you don't really need the force that they are hitting the door do you? I would imagine that you only need to know the mass and velocity of the wagon.
A N*m is a Joule.
 
Ok so the wagon's mass is 250 Kg and it's velocity at the point of impact is 0.8 m/s.

Could someone please correct/ confirm;

p=mv

so p=200 Ns

F=delta p/t

So if it takes 0.1 secs for the wagon to come to rest F = 2000N

Is 0.1 sec a reasonable assumption? This is a very heavy furnace door so I assume it is very rigid.
 
Eh, it would more than likely not be safe to make an assumption for this. If you assume that the time is 0.05 instead of 0.10, only one-twentieth of a second difference, the force is doubled.
 
I would start with using what the customer gave and assume they knew what they were talking about in terms of energy. Then I would look at your springs' force vs. deflection plots. The area under the curve, in a perfect world, is the energy absorbed-produced when the spring is compressed or extended. A starting point would be a spring that has that area under it's curve that meets that energy requirement.

I would still ask the customer to verify the units given.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
750
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
11K