Calculating g using horizontal uniform circular motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an experiment aimed at calculating the acceleration due to gravity (g) using horizontal uniform circular motion. The original poster describes a setup involving two masses connected by a string, with one mass being rotated while the other remains stationary. The challenge lies in understanding the relationship between the forces acting on the masses and how to derive the value of g from the observed data.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of free-body diagrams to analyze the forces acting on the masses. There is a discussion about the tension in the string and its components, as well as the relationship between the vertical and horizontal components of tension. Questions arise regarding the necessity of knowing the angle θ and whether the components can be equated. The original poster expresses confusion about combining the components and calculating g, considering the potential for errors in the experiment.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided guidance on the use of free-body diagrams and the relationship between the tensions in the string. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the problem, with some participants suggesting that the original poster check the direction of the tensions. The original poster has reflected on their calculations and acknowledged a mistake regarding the mass values, indicating a shift in understanding, though no consensus has been reached on the exact method to calculate g.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a lack of access to teacher support due to the timing of the homework assignment, which may impact their ability to clarify concepts or resolve uncertainties. There is also an indication of potential experimental error affecting the results.

Ebo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I’ve recently done an experiment that I didn’t completely understand and now it seems I’ve lost all my notes as well (the notes written down from the teacher’s board, with a formula I really need, but didn’t understand). This work is supposed to be completed during the summer holiday, so I can’t really ask my teacher for help, either.

During the experiment, I was supposed to find gravity using “horizontal uniform circular motion.” I had two different masses attached to a piece of string and rotated one of the masses above my head while trying to make the other mass stay still.

This is what I’ve managed to figure out this far:
I believe T1 (in the part of the string not rotating) should be equal to T2 (the tension in the rotating string).
X (T1) = 0
Y (T2) = m(1)*g

X (T2) = T * sin(θ) = ((4*π^2*R)/T^2)*m(2)
Y (T2) = T * cos(θ) = g * m (2)
I did not calculate θ as my teacher said it would not be necessary.
This is the point where I think I’m starting to get lost. I’ve got the different components, but I’m not sure how to combine them. I’ve no idea if this works at all:
Y (T total) = g(M(1) – M(2))
X (T total) = ((4*π^2*R)/T^2)*m(2)

And now for my question. I’m sorry, it might sound really stupid, but like I said I’m totally confused and this is my first year with physics, so please bear with me:

Can I now assume that the Y-component of T total equals the X-component of T total?
If not, how can I calculate T2? I thought of using the Pythagoras theorem, but it seemed like I would end up with g on both sides of my formula, and g is what I am supposed to calculate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to draw the free-body diagrams for the two masses ... the centripedal force for the rotating mass is supplied by the weight of the hanging mass. The tension in each section of the string is equal - yes.
 
I have drawn (several) free body diagrams, but they don't seem to help me much. I really don't see how I can calculate T2 without knowing θ.

I tried to use this formula:
g = (4*π^2*R*M2)/(T^2*(M2-M1)

However, this gave me a value of nearly 20 m s^-2, so I guess it's wrong(?) I’m not completely sure, though, because there’s probably loads of error in the experiment.

My thinking was that this way I will only get g on one side (Ty = g(M2-M1); because Ty for T2 > Ty for T1 because M2 > M1). On the other side of the equation, I would have (4*π^2*R*M2)/(T^2), the Tx components.

Can I assume that the Tx components equals the Ty components?
 
If you consider the string connected to the rotating mass the tension has a horizontal component and a vertical component.
Can you see what these components must be equal to?...what do they do?
 
The vertical component equals M2*g, and the horizontal component equals the centripedal force. If I add them together (as vectors), I would get the tension in the string connected to the rotating mass and the tension in this string equals the tension in the hanging mass (=M1*g)

However, if I use the Pythagoras theorem to get the tension in the string connected to the rotating mass, I think I would end up with g as a component on both sides of my equation (T1=T2) ...
 
if I use the Pythagoras theorem to get the tension in the string connected to the rotating mass, I think I would end up with g as a component on both sides of my equation (T1=T2)
Yes - yes you would. This is why we have algebra :)

Start out like this: T_1=T_2=T, then write: T^2= ... complete the relation and solve for g.
 
Alright ...
T(2)^2 = M(2)^2 * ((4*π^2*R)/T^2)^2 + M(2)^2 * g^2
T(1)^2 = M(1)^2 * g^2

Solving for g ...

g^2*(M(2) - M(1))^2 = M(2)^2 * ((4*π^2*R)/T^2)

g = (4*π^2*R*M(1))/((T^2)*(M(1)-M(2))

The trouble is, this gives me a negative value for g (because M(1)<M(2)).
 
Check the direction of the two tensions the way you calculated them.
 
After another look at my data I realize I was wrong. M(2) was in fact smaller than M(1), not bigger. I somehow forgot that. Which means that the formula works. I don't get the correct value, but my teacher told me I probably wouldn't, so that's okay.

Thank you so much! This has really helped me a lot :)
 
  • #10
Well fair enough - and so long as you got something that was the right order of magnitude. It's not a very sensitive experiment ... mostly to develop your ability to do the sort of reasoning above and train your observation skills.
 

Similar threads

Replies
55
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K