Calculating Matrix Representation of 11><11 for 2 Qubits

  • Thread starter Thread starter Getterdog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qubits
Click For Summary
Calculating the matrix representation of the outer product |11><11| involves understanding the correct ordering of basis vectors, such as (|00>,|01>,|10>,|11>). The resulting matrix is a projection operator for a one-dimensional subspace within a four-dimensional vector space, represented as a matrix with a single non-zero entry. The confusion arose from misordering the basis vectors, which is crucial for accurate calculations. Proper ordering allows for the correct representation of operators in matrix form. Understanding these concepts clarifies the process of forming matrix representations in quantum mechanics.
Getterdog
Messages
83
Reaction score
6
Forming the matrix representation of say 1><1 is no problem but how does one calculate the matrix representation of 11><11 ? Is it
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 1
Any help? thanks jack
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i suppose 1> is (1 0)t then 11 is (1 0 0 0)t and the matrix is 1 in the upper left corner and all the rest 0.
 
Clarification

I take that 11>. Is (0 1 0 1 ) and < 10. Refers to ( 0 1 1 0 ) . The outer product as a matrix has more than 1 non zero entry.,so I'm still stuck. Any clarification on the correct way to do this.? Thanks
 
Unless 11< refers to ( 0 0 0 1) and 10< refers to (0 1 0 0 ) ,01< to (0 0 1 0) Is this it??
 
The matrix elements depend on the order of the basis vectors, so you need to choose a way to order them, e.g. (|00>,|01>,|10>,|11>). The matrix of |11><11| with respect to this ordered basis is
\begin{pmatrix}0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} This could be anticipated from the fact that |11><11| is a projection operator for a 1-dimensional subspace of the vector space, which is 4-dimensional.

The matrix of any operator T with respect to this ordered basis is
\begin{pmatrix}\langle 00|T|00\rangle & \langle 00|T|01\rangle &\dots & &\\ \langle 01|T|00\rangle & \langle 01|T|01\rangle & \dots \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots \\ \end{pmatrix}
For more information, see the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=694922 about the relationship between linear operators and matrices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
If my previous reply didn't register, thanks,my problem was that I didn't order the basis vectors correctly. Now I can proceed , although something bugs me about ordering of the basis, nature doesn't seem to care about humans need to order anything. Thanks
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
669
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K