Calculating Particle Lifetimes to Unstable Particle Decay

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HeavyWater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lifetime Particle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the lifetimes of unstable particles, specifically Tritium, positronium, pion, and muonium. Tritium has a lifetime of approximately 13 years, while positronium decays in about one-tenth of a nanosecond. Participants suggest identifying decay modes, approximating their amplitudes, and integrating over available phase space for accurate calculations. Key references include JJ Sakurai's "Advanced Quantum Mechanics" for positronium lifetime calculations and the application of Fermi's Golden Rules for decay processes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts, including unstable particles and decay modes.
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics, particularly Fermi's Golden Rule.
  • Knowledge of phase space integration techniques in particle decay calculations.
  • Basic grasp of electromagnetic interactions between particles and antiparticles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the decay modes of pions and their lifetimes.
  • Study Fermi's Golden Rule and its applications in particle decay calculations.
  • Explore the concept of phase space in quantum mechanics for decay processes.
  • Investigate the properties and theoretical implications of true muonium.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and researchers interested in the decay mechanisms of unstable particles and their lifetimes.

HeavyWater
Messages
55
Reaction score
4
The lifetime of Tritium is about 13 years. The lifetime of positronium is about one-tenth of a nanosecond. Can you point me to some papers or tell me how to calculate the lifetime of an unstable particle? For example, suppose I want to calculate the lifetime of the pion? Or muonium? Etc.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NikolaTesla2
Physics news on Phys.org
Identify possible decay modes (at least the most common ones). Approximate their amplitudes, then integrate over the available phase space for the decay. For the muon or Z boson you can get a good approximation on one page, for more complicated systems you are looking at much more work.

Muonium is (unlike the name would suggest) a bound state between an electron and an antimuon. It "decays" via the antimuon decaying, so it has nearly the same lifetime as a free muon.
A bound state between a muon and an antimuon would be called "true muonium" and hasn't been observed yet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Thank you mfb. I did not expect such a quick response. I am intrigued by the decay of positronium in the singlet spin state. Each of the constituents is a stable particle; yet this composite state decays into two gammas. We have an EM interaction between a particle and its anti particle--this would seem like a sure bet for a stable composite system. (Now, it didn't occur to me until today, that the positron should be treated as a Dirac anti particle). What do you think is causing this system to decay: a lack of enough binding energy? A surface tension type effect? No rush needed on your response.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
HeavyWater said:
What do you think is causing this system to decay
A possible decay mode. Simple particle/antiparticle annihilation. I'm sure there are publications calculating the lifetime.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
Thank you to everyone for your helpful comments. The calculation of the lifetime of positronium is described on p227 of JJ Sakurai's book on Advanced Quantum Mechanics. I didn't think that the volume per unit time of positron decays could be inverted to give the lifetime of a unit volume of positronium. I also didn't think about Fermi's Golden Rules.

I had a lot of fun thinking about positronium--I thought that this might be an application of Chaos Theory. Thanks to everyone for your encouragement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K