Calculating Speed of Center of Mass for Rotating Disk on Pivot

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a uniform solid disk and a uniform hoop, both free to rotate about a pivot point on their rim. The task is to determine the speed of the center of mass when the disk reaches a specific position during its swing, as well as the speed of the lowest point of the disk in that position. The context includes considerations of energy conservation and rotational dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy, noting the initial potential energy and the kinetic energy at the lowest point. There are questions about the use of the parallel axis theorem and how to adjust the moment of inertia for rotation about the pivot point.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the relationship between translational and rotational kinetic energy. There is exploration of different approaches to the problem, including treating the disk as rotating about the center of mass versus the pivot point. Some guidance on using the parallel axis theorem has been offered, but no consensus has been reached on a single method.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of rotational dynamics and energy conservation without explicit numerical solutions. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the adjustments needed for the moment of inertia when pivoting about the edge of the disk.

dkgojackets
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A uniform solid disk of radius (r) 6.71 m and mass (m) 38 kg is free to rotate on a frictionless pivot through a point on its rim. If facing the disk, the pivot is on the left side. The disk is then released. What is the speed of the center of mass when the disk reaches a position such that the pivot is now at the top (lowest point in swing)?

What is the speed of the lowest point of the disk in said position?

Repeat part one for a uniform hoop.

Homework Equations



Looks like conservation of energy here. I know that the disk drops down one radius, so my initial energy was just mgr. At the bottom it has translational and rotational KE. .5mv^2 + .5Iw^2.

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure, I'm looking for a step in the right direction. Probably need to use the parallel axis theorem somehow since it isn't rotating through the center?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your formula KE = .5mv^2 + .5Iw^2 , v is the linear velocity of the CG of the disk, and I is the inertia about the CG.

The disk is pivoting about a point on the circumference, and that gives you a relation between the velocity at the CG and the rotational speed w.
 
I know I can substitute v/r for w. I have mgr = .5mv^2 + .5I(v/r)^2, with v being velocity at the center of mass.

I have r and m, I just don't know how to adjust the moment of inertia for it rotating around the edge.
 
If you, as AlephZero suggests, treat the total KE as the sum of the translational KE of the cm (.5mv^2) plus the rotational KE about the cm (.5Iw^2), then I is about the cm.

You can also treat the disk as in pure rotation about the pivot, in which case the KE = .5Iw^2, where I is now about the pivot point not the cm. (Use the parallel axis theorem to find I.)
 
If you use the motion of the CG (translation and rotation) as you have done, then you don't need to adjust the moment of inertia.

The KE of a body is always the sum of two parts:

Translational energy of the CG (.5mv^2)
+ Rotational energy of the body rotating about the CG (.5Iw^2).

---------------------------

You could do the problem a different way, and consider the body rotating about the pivot. In that case you would use the parallel axis theorem to get the moment of inertia about the pivot = I (about the CG) + mr^2.

If you do it that way, there is no translation energy (because the pivot is not moving), but the additional rotational energy of .5(mr^2)w^2 is the same as the translational energy of the CG in the first method, because v = rw.

Do it whichever way you find easiest to think about.
 
Got it. I was just combining the two approaches, using the parallel axis theorem to find MoI in the first equation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K