Calculating the Age of an Ancient Boat: A Radioactive Decay Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the age of an ancient boat using radioactive decay principles, specifically the decay of carbon-14. The original activity of carbon-14 in living matter is 0.250 Bq, while the activity measured in a 1.00g sample from the boat is 0.160 Bq. The calculated age of the board is approximately 3700 years, derived from the ratio of activities and the half-life of carbon-14, which is 5730 years. Participants confirm that using the exponential decay formula A = A₀e^(-λt) is a valid method for this calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-life concepts
  • Familiarity with the carbon-14 dating method
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and logarithms
  • Basic proficiency in scientific calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the radioactive decay formula A = A₀e^(-λt)
  • Learn about the significance of half-life in various isotopes beyond carbon-14
  • Explore the implications of carbon dating in archaeology and geology
  • Investigate the limitations and potential errors in carbon-14 dating
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fields such as archaeology, geology, and environmental science, as well as anyone interested in the principles of radioactive dating and its applications.

Iscariot
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The carbon in living matter contains a fixed proportion of the radioactive isotope carbon-14. The carbon-14 in 1.00g of carbon from living matter has an activity of 0.250Bq. The half-life of carbon-14 is 5730. When a plant dies the proportion of carbon-14 decreases due to radioactive decay. A 1.00g sample of carbon from an ancient boat has an activity of 0.160Bq. Determine the age of the board.

Here's how I solved it...

Original Activity = 0.25Bq
Activity of Sample = 0.16Bq

Then I just calculated what's that as a ratio of the original activity...

0.16/0.25 = 0.64

Then multiplied the half time by this number:

5730 * 0.64 = 3666 years ~ 3700 years

Which is the correct answer. However this seems like a bit of a fluke. Especially since I've got a feeling I should be using this formula:

x = x(original) ^-(lamda)*(time)

Can anyone put my mind at ease, was my answer a fluke or is that a valid method to calculating the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if you do it your way you aren't really considering the fact that it's an exponential decay.
I would say that you would use the activity equation given by:
A=A_oe^-^\lambda ^t
It's just as easy. Just rearrange it and then take the natural log of both sides to solve for t.
Where \lambda=ln(2)/T_1_/_2
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K