Calculating the amplitude that a particle is spin up

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the amplitude of a spin 1/2 particle being spin up, independent of its position. The wavefunction is represented as a spinor field, where the amplitude for being spin up at a position is given by ψ₊(x,t). It is clarified that while one can compute the probability of the particle being spin up by integrating the squared amplitude over all positions, defining an amplitude without regard to position is generally not meaningful. A suggestion is made that if the phase of ψ₊(x) is uniform across space, a coherent amplitude could be defined, but this is not applicable in all cases. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the distinction between calculating probabilities and amplitudes in quantum mechanics.
dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
The wavefunction for a spin 1/2 particle is a spinor field of the form \psi(\mathbf{x},t)=\left( <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> \psi_{+}(\mathbf{x},t)\\ <br /> \psi_{-}(\mathbf{x},t)<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right).
\psi_{+}(\mathbf{x},t) is the amplitude that the particle is both spin up and located at position x at time t. How can I calculate the amplitude that the particle is just spin up, without any regards for its position? Would it be something like
\int \psi_{+}(\mathbf{x,t})d^3 \mathbf{x}?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dEdt said:
The wavefunction for a spin 1/2 particle is a spinor field of the form \psi(\mathbf{x},t)=\left( <br /> \begin{array}{cc} <br /> \psi_{+}(\mathbf{x},t)\\ <br /> \psi_{-}(\mathbf{x},t)<br /> \end{array} <br /> \right).
\psi_{+}(\mathbf{x},t) is the amplitude that the particle is both spin up and located at position x at time t. How can I calculate the amplitude that the particle is just spin up, without any regards for its position? Would it be something like
\int \psi_{+}(\mathbf{x,t})d^3 \mathbf{x}?

Here is what I thought of

|\Psi\rangle = |\psi\rangle\otimes|\alpha\rangle

The completeness should lead to
\int dx |x\rangle\langle x| \otimes \left(|\uparrow\rangle\langle \uparrow |+ |\downarrow\rangle\langle \downarrow |\right) = \mathbb{I}

Thus we have the expansion
\left[\int dx |x\rangle\langle x| \otimes \left(|\uparrow\rangle\langle \uparrow |+ |\downarrow\rangle\langle \downarrow |\right)\right] |\Psi\rangle = \int dx \langle x|\psi\rangle |x\rangle \otimes \left(\langle \uparrow |\alpha\rangle |\uparrow\rangle + \langle \downarrow |\alpha\rangle |\downarrow\rangle\right)

Take the inner product with spin up state vector. [I don't know if this is valid]
\langle \uparrow |\Psi\rangle = \int dx \langle x|\psi\rangle \langle \uparrow |\alpha\rangle |x\rangle

The norm of this should give us the desired number but this number can be obtained by taking inner product of |\psi\rangle\otimes |\uparrow\rangle with the state vector written in first equation.

I am myself confused. How do we write \psi_{+} in form of innerproduct?
Can we write
<br /> \psi_{+} = \langle x|\psi\rangle \langle \uparrow |\alpha\rangle ?<br />
 
Last edited:
Mentors... advisors ...
any correction/suggestion will be helpful :)

I think the correct answer is (in terms of probability)
\int |\psi_{+}(\mathbf{x,t})|^2d^3 \mathbf{x}
I want to know if the mathematics I have done is correct. Thanks
 
dEdt said:
How can I calculate the amplitude that the particle is just spin up, without any regards for its position?

There's no such quantity. You can calculate the *probability* that the particle is spin-up without regards for its position, and your expression for this probability in #3 is correct. But in general it doesn't make sense to talk about the *amplitude* for the particle to be spin-up, regardless of position. You can't just do ##\int d^3 x \psi_+(x)## because squaring this will not give you the correct probability that you wrote down in #3.
 
The_Duck said:
But in general it doesn't make sense to talk about the *amplitude* for the particle to be spin-up, regardless of position.
In quantum computation we do it all the time. We don't care at what position our nucleus is (in case of NMR) but we do care about the amplitudes of nucleus in spin up and down states.
 
Sure, I think it makes sense to define such an amplitude if ##\psi_+(x)## has essentially the same phase everywhere in space. Then I think we can define a sensible amplitude ##e^{i \phi} \sqrt{\int d^3 x |\psi_+ (x)|^2}## where ##e^{i \phi}## is the constant global phase of ##\psi_+(x)##. But if ##\psi_+(x)## is not coherent in this way I don't think you can define an amplitude to be spin up independent of position. We are tracing out the position degree of freedom and we end up with a density matrix, whose entries are probabilities and not amplitudes.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
3K