Calculating the Forces on a Charge

  • Thread starter Thread starter GodlessStar
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating the forces on a charge +q located on the z-axis, specifically addressing the algebraic errors in deriving the electric field and total force. Key mistakes identified include the incorrect use of symbols for unit vectors, miscalculating the total electric field as a subtraction rather than an addition, and neglecting the y-component of the electric field. The correct expression for the electric field above the midpoint of a uniformly charged bar is provided, along with necessary adjustments to the algebraic approach for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and forces in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with vector notation and unit vectors
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation in physics problems
  • Basic grasp of Cartesian coordinate systems in three dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the electric field from a uniformly charged line using the formula $$ \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{2\lambda L}{z\sqrt{4z^2+L^2}}\hat z $$
  • Learn about vector addition in electrostatics, focusing on superposition principles
  • Study the implications of charge placement on electric field direction and magnitude
  • Practice breaking down complex algebraic expressions into simpler components for clarity
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and forces in a three-dimensional context.

GodlessStar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A charge +q is located on the x-axis at a distance h from the xy-plane. There are two uniformly charged bars on the plane as shown in the figure. Calculate the force on the charge q. (Use the results from Ex 2.2)
Relevant Equations
Eqn. 2.2 is located down below.
1742796963858.png

Here is my attempt. Am I doing it wrong? I am worried I messed up the algebra of it.
1742797046689.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's difficult to read what you've written. Also, it would help if we knew what were the results of exercise 2.2.
 
GodlessStar said:
Homework Statement: A charge +q is located on the x-axis at a distance h from the xy-plane.
That wouldn't make sense. To match the diagram, the Homework Statement should say "A charge +q is located on the z-axis..."

GodlessStar said:
Relevant Equations: Eqn. 2.2 is located down below.
There is no equation 2.2 shown. There is an expression labelled 2.2 with no explanation of its meaning.

GodlessStar said:
Here is my attempt. Am I doing it wrong? I am worried I messed up the algebra of it. View attachment 358900
Not checked for the same reasons noted by @PeroK in Post #2. But a few comments...

You appear to be using the same symbol for different things, e.g. ##\hat M## (or maybe it's ##\hat \mu##) is used for two different unit vectors. You could use subscripts 1 and 2, or L and R.

The total field is ##\vec {E_1} + \vec {E_2}##, not ##\vec {E_1} - \vec {E_2}##.

Don't forget you are asked for the total force, not the total field.
 
There are four mistakes.

The first one is the result from Example 2.2. The expression for the electric field a distance ## z ## above the midpoint of a bar of length ## L ## that carries a uniform line charge density ## \lambda ## should be $$ \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{2\lambda L}{z\sqrt{4z^2+L^2}}\hat z $$.

The second one is the length of the right bar in the expression for the electric field produced by the right bar. The length is ## 2a ##.

The third one is the expression for ## \vec E_{total} ## in the final equation. It should be $$ \vec E_1+\vec E_2 $$, as it is said in the post #3.

The fourth one is the expression for the unit vector which represents the direction of the electric field produced by the left bar in the final equation. It should be $$ \frac{h\hat k+2a\hat j}{\sqrt{h^2+4a^2}} $$.

At the end the expression for the electric field should be multiplied by the charge ## +q ## to get what the force is, as it is said in the post #3.
 
Gavran said:
There are four mistakes.

The first one is the result from Example 2.2. The expression for the electric field a distance ## z ## above the midpoint of a bar of length ## L ## that carries a uniform line charge density ## \lambda ## should be $$ \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{2\lambda L}{z\sqrt{4z^2+L^2}}\hat z $$.
What happened to the y-component of the field? The lines of charge are at different distances from the x-axis.
 
kuruman said:
What happened to the y-component of the field? The lines of charge are at different distances from the x-axis.
The expression is just a hint and the midpoint of the bar is the origin of a three dimensional Cartesian coordinate system where the bar is placed in the xy plane.

The problem solution includes y-component and z-component of the field by using the vectors $$ \frac{h\hat k+2a\hat j}{\sqrt{h^2+4a^2}} $$ and $$ \frac{h\hat k-a\hat j}{\sqrt{h^2+a^2}} $$.
 
GodlessStar said:
I am worried I messed up the algebra of it.
Lines of charge.png
Then break up the algebra into smaller pieces with fewer symbols. Look at the diagram on the right. You have the superposition of the field from the right ##\mathbf E_R## and from the left ##\mathbf E_L.## For the field from the right, $$\mathbf E_R=E_R\sin(\theta_R)~(-\mathbf {\hat y})+E_R\cos(\theta_R)~(+\mathbf {\hat z})$$ where $$\sin(\theta_R)=\frac{a}{\sqrt{a^2+h^2}}~;~~~\cos(\theta_R)=\frac{h}{\sqrt{a^2+h^2}}.$$You get a similar expression for the field from the left. Add the two vectors together, then replace the trig functions and field magnitudes at the very end.

(Edited to fix mislabeled angles.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Gavran said:
The expression is just a hint and the midpoint of the bar is the origin of a three dimensional Cartesian coordinate system where the bar is placed in the xy plane.

The problem solution includes y-component and z-component of the field by using the vectors $$ \frac{h\hat k+2a\hat j}{\sqrt{h^2+4a^2}} $$ and $$ \frac{h\hat k-a\hat j}{\sqrt{h^2+a^2}} $$.
OK. In your list of OP's mistakes in post #4, when you said that the electric field "should be" it was not clear to me that you were referring to the general case and not specifically to OP's answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
856
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
891
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
979
Replies
1
Views
1K