Calculating velocity and acceleration from a position-time graph

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexandria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics Motion
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
10 replies · 2K views · last reply
alexandria
Messages
168
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Two-part physics worksheet: a table of time in seconds against position in metres downward for a falling orange (0 to 1.50 s, 0 to 10.35 m), with instructions to draw a position-time graph and a velocity-time graph.


Homework Equations



acceleration equation:
a = v2 – v1 / t2 – t1

The Attempt at a Solution


Can someone please tell me if my answers make sense. Thanks in advance :)[/B]

21.
Graph titled "Position versus time for an orange" plotting position in metres down against time in seconds, with dashed tangent lines drawn at several points on the curve.


22.
to calculate the velocity, i determined the slope of the tangents, postioned at 0.50s, 0.75 s, and 1.00 s

upload_2016-3-21_22-48-12.png

Using this information, i created a velocity time graph for the orange
Hand-drawn graph titled 'Velocity versus time for an Orange' on grid paper, with velocity (m/s) [down] on the vertical axis from 0 to 11.0 and time (s) on the horizontal axis from 0 to 1.50. Three grey points plotted at about (0.50, 4.7), (0.75, 6.7) and (1.00, 8.5).


Acceleration:

a = v2 – v1 / t2 – t1

a = 8.5 m/s (down) – 6.7 m/s (down) / 1.00 s – 0.75 s

a = 7.2 m/s2 (down)
 
Attachments
  • Two-part physics problem with a table of time in seconds against position in metres (down) for a falling orange: 0 to 1.50 s, positions 0 to 10.35 m, repeated for questions 21 and 22.
    upload_2016-3-21_22-37-18.png
    16 KB · Views: 505
Physics news on Phys.org
what do you mean? are you referring to the velocity i calculated in my time-velocity data table? and what do you mean by most reliable? arent they all reliable?
 
alexandria said:
what do you mean? are you referring to the velocity i calculated in my time-velocity data table? and what do you mean by most reliable? arent they all reliable?
They're not wonderfully reliable because you are drawing tangents by eye and finding the velocities from their slopes. I can see, for example, that your tangent at 0.5s is a bit too steep.
There is one completely reliable velocity that you have not used. You do not even have to draw a tangent to find it!
 
alexandria said:
i don't understand :P
Which bit don't you understand, the inaccuracy inherent to the method you have been told to use to find velocities, or what data point you have not used?
 
both
i was just told to draw tangents and then calculate the slope of each tangent to determine the velocity
here's an example from my lesson:
Worksheet question 11 with a table of time in seconds against position in metres [down]: 0 s at 0 m, 2.0 s at 0.6 m, 4.0 s at 2.4 m, 6.0 s at 5.4 m, 8.0 s at 9.6 m, 10.0 s at 15.0 m, followed by parts a to d about graphing and slopes.

Graph of position versus time for a crate of radishes, with position in metres (down) on the vertical axis from 0 to 15 and time in seconds on the horizontal axis. A curved position-time line rises steeply, with dotted tangent lines drawn at several points, and a straight dotted velocity line rises from the origin on the right-hand velocity axis.


Table labelled b) with columns Time (s) and Velocity (m/s) [down]: 4.0 s, 1.1; 6.0 s, 1.8; 8.0 s, 2.4. Below it, text says the values should be similar to the table but may not be exact due to slight errors in drawing tangents.

Graph titled 'Velocity versus time for a crate of radishes': a straight line through the origin rising to about 2.5 m/s at 10.0 s, with four plotted points, velocity in m/s [down] against time in s.
 
alexandria said:
i was just told to draw tangents and then calculate the slope of each tangent to determine the velocity
Yes, I understand that, but you must realize that drawing tangents by eye like that is open to substantial error. The tangent you drew at 0.5s looks to me more like the tangent at 0.55s.
Since you are following a worked example, I suppose you cannot do much better than that. But had I prepared the example I would have taken the velocity at time 0 as an obvious known value. Note that using that value together with your t=1 tangent gives a rather more accurate value for g.
 
ok i understand, should i fix the tangent at 0.5 s, will that make it more accurate?
 
alexandria said:
ok i understand, should i fix the tangent at 0.5 s, will that make it more accurate?
Yes, a bit.