Calculating Wave Amplitude and Frequency

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating wave amplitude and frequency in the context of oscillations, specifically focusing on the effects of amplitude decay over cycles. Participants explore the implications of a 2.0% reduction in amplitude per cycle and its relationship to energy in simple harmonic motion (SHM).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to calculate amplitude reductions and question the interpretation of decay rates. Some express confusion over the application of exponential decay and its implications for calculating amplitude over multiple cycles.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the nature of amplitude decay and its mathematical representation. There is ongoing exploration of the relationship between amplitude and energy in SHM, with hints and suggestions being offered to clarify misunderstandings.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment that specifies the decay rate and the period of oscillation. There is a noted lack of consensus on certain interpretations, particularly regarding the calculation of tau and its application in the context of non-integer cycles.

Edel Crine
Messages
89
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
A restoring force of unknown magnitude is exerted on a object
that oscillates with a period of 0.50 s.
When the object is in an evacuated container, the motion is simple harmonic motion, with an amplitude of 0.10 m.
When air is allowed into the container, the amplitude decreases by 2.0% with each cycle of the oscillation.
(a) What is the amplitude after 25 cycles?
(b) What fraction of the initial energy is left 6.3 s after air is admitted?
Relevant Equations
A\left(t\right)=A_{0}e^{-\frac{t}{2τ}}
w_{d}=w\sqrt{1-\frac{\frac{b^{2}}{m^{2}}}{4w^{2}}}
My attempts were these,
a) 2.0% / cycle * 25 cycles = 50%
So, I got half of the first amplitude which is 0.5 m (seems not right though...)

b) w=2pi/T , so put 0.5 at T, I got w=12.6 cycle/sec
12.6 cycle / sec * 6.3 sec = 79.2 cycles and it is obviously not right to me...

May I get some help from you all...? Thank you so much...!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the amplitude is ##0.1m## how much does it reduce by in one cycle? If the amplitude is ##0.08m## how much does it reduce by in one cycle?

What is a percentage reduction?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
PeroK said:
If the amplitude is ##0.1m## how much does it reduce by in one cycle? If the amplitude is ##0.08m## how much does it reduce by in one cycle?

What is a percentage reduction?
For the first one, it would be reduced by 0.002m / cycle and second would be 0.0016 m / cycle?
 
PeroK said:
If the amplitude is ##0.1m## how much does it reduce by in one cycle? If the amplitude is ##0.08m## how much does it reduce by in one cycle?

What is a percentage reduction?
Oopps I worte it wrong, my first answer for a) was 0.05m, not 0.5m
 
Edel Crine said:
For the first one, it would be reduced by 0.002m / cycle and second would be 0.0016 m / cycle?
But in part a) you used the same reduction for all cycles. You took ##25 \times 0.002m##.

Hint: have you ever heard of exponential decay?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
Edel Crine said:
the amplitude decreases by 2.0% with each cycle of the oscillation.
I would interpret that as the amplitude reducing by 2% of what it was in the preceding cycle, not by 2% of its initial amplitude.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
PeroK said:
But in part a) you've used the same reduction for all cycles.

Hint: have you ever heard of exponential decay?
yes like A(t)=Ae^(-t/2τ)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Edel Crine said:
yes like A(t)=Ae^(-t/2τ)
Can you see how that applies here?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
haruspex said:
I would interpret that as the amplitude reducing by 2% of what it was in the preceding cycle, not by 2% of its initial amplitude.
Woo yeah, I've misunderstood the problem since now..
 
  • #10
PeroK said:
Can you see how that applies here?
I know initial amplitude and T for both period and 6.3 sec, but I am not sure about tau, τ...
 
  • #11
Edel Crine said:
I know initial amplitude and T for both period and 6.3 sec, but I am not sure about tau, τ...
You can calculate ##\tau## from the given decay rate:

Edel Crine said:
Homework Statement:: A restoring force of unknown magnitude is exerted on a object
that oscillates with a period of 0.50 s.

When air is allowed into the container, the amplitude decreases by 2.0% with each cycle of the oscillation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
  • #12
PeroK said:
You can calculate ##\tau## from the given decay rate:
I just searched, so we can use the equation, τ=1/λ which is inverse of decay rate?
 
  • #13
PeroK said:
You can calculate ##\tau## from the given decay rate:
Then, 1/0.02 = 50, so the equation would be A(t) = Ae^-t/100 ?
 
  • #14
Edel Crine said:
I just searched, so we can use the equation, τ=1/λ which is inverse of decay rate?
You need to plug the numbers into get ##\tau##. You know that if ##t = 0.5s##, then the amplitude is ##0.98A_0##.

Note: for part a) you are given a whole number of cycles: ##25##. There is a quick way to calculate the amplitude: hint think of compound interest. But, in part b) the time is ##6.3s##, which is not a whole number of cycles. That suggested to me that you were expected to think of exponential decay. That allows you to calculate things for any time, even when it's not a whole number of cycles.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
  • #15
Edel Crine said:
b) w=2pi/T , so put 0.5 at T, I got w=12.6 cycle/sec
12.6 cycle / sec * 6.3 sec = 79.2 cycles and it is obviously not right to me...

May I get some help from you all...? Thank you so much...!

Note that if ##T = 0.5s##, then that is ##2## cycles per second (by definition). ##\omega## is the angular frequency, which is not cycles per second.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
  • #16
PeroK said:
Note that if ##T = 0.5s##, then that is ##2## cycles per second (by definition). ##\omega## is the angular frequency, which is not cycles per second.
for τ, I got 12.37 sec and 0.06m for a)...!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #17
That answer looks right.

For part b) what is the relationship between energy and amplitude for SHM?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
  • #18
PeroK said:
That answer looks right.

For part b) what is the relationship between energy and amplitude for SHM?
E=1/2 mw^2A^2 ...?
 
  • #19
Edel Crine said:
E=1/2 mw^2A^2 ...?
Yes, proportional to the square of the amplitude. You can get the energy from the amplitude. And you know how the amplitude decays. So ...

Hint: remember that ##mw^2 = k## is just a constant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
  • #20
PeroK said:
Yes, proportional to the square of the amplitude. You can get the energy from the amplitude. And you know how the amplitude decays. So ...

Hint: remember that ##mw^2 = k## is just a constant.
So, it would be just Eo/Ed which is simply A0^2/Ad^2...?
 
  • #21
Edel Crine said:
So, it would be just Eo/Ed which is simply A0^2/Ad^2...?
What's ##d##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
  • #22
PeroK said:
What's ##d##?
Oh it's for the symbol of damped amplitude.
 
  • #23
Edel Crine said:
Oh it's for the symbol of damped amplitude.
So, what's your answer to part b)?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
  • #24
PeroK said:
So, what's your answer to part b)?
About 60.1% from the original...?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #25
Looks good.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Edel Crine
  • #26
PeroK said:
Looks good.
Thank you so much...! I really really appreciate!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
952
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K