Calculating work (positive or negative)

  • Thread starter Thread starter okgo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Negative Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the work required to lift a 12 kg box to a height of 1.3 meters, with participants exploring the implications of different lifting methods, including straight up versus a curvy path. The subject area includes concepts of work, force, and gravitational effects in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of work using the formula W=Fcos(x)S, questioning the angle used in the calculations and the implications of lifting the box at different angles or speeds. There is confusion regarding the effect of curvy paths on work done against gravity.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants clarifying misunderstandings about angles in the work equation and exploring how speed and path affect the work done. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between force, direction, and work, but no consensus has been reached on the implications of lifting techniques.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions of work in different contexts, particularly regarding vertical versus horizontal motion, and the assumptions about speed and path taken during lifting. There is a focus on the need to resolve foundational issues before progressing further.

okgo
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Estimate (to the nearest order of magnitude) how much work I must do to pick up a 12 kg box to a height of 1.3m. Does it mattert how I pick up the box (fast or slow, straight up or along a curvy path, etc.)?

Homework Equations



W=Fcos(x)S

The Attempt at a Solution



9.8(m/s^2)*12 kg = 117.6N
W=Fs
W=Fcos(angle)s
s=1.3m
If the box was lifted straight up, the angle is zero.
W=117.6cos(90)(1.3m)
W=0

It does not matter if you pick the box up slow or fast.I'm confused at the curvy part of the question. If I pick up the box at an angle, is it always negative since I'm doing work against gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
okgo said:
If the box was lifted straight up, the angle is zero.
W=117.6cos(90)(1.3m)
W=0

If the angle is 0, why did you use 90?
 
Sorry, previously, I did the problem thinking it was zero, but that's horizontal, not vertical. Since you pick up the box it should be some degree above zero. I did the calculation picking the box straight up.

The question ask what happens if you did a wavy motion which got me confused. ?
 
okgo said:
Sorry, previously, I did the problem thinking it was zero, but that's horizontal, not vertical. Since you pick up the box it should be some degree above zero. I did the calculation picking the box straight up.

The question ask what happens if you did a wavy motion which got me confused. ?

I think you better resolve the first issue first.

In the work equation, Force times distance, the Cosθ term is to account for the projection of the force in the direction of motion.

If you were calculating work in moving the box horizontally then true enough the work would be 0 if the force applied was perpendicular and none of it was involved in moving it horizontally.

But the question you are dealing with is that the direction of motion is UP. And that is against gravity which is down. And your force is UP. And the angle with respect to that movement is 0. And using θ of 0° would be correct.
 
Okay so if I pick the box up at a curvy path, which might mean at an angle, then there would be work done.

But about the speed of the object. Does that mean if I pick up the box twice as fast I would have to do 2*N, therefore 2*W? Or does the equation only depend on the weight of the object?
 
okgo said:
Okay so if I pick the box up at a curvy path, which might mean at an angle, then there would be work done.

But about the speed of the object. Does that mean if I pick up the box twice as fast I would have to do 2*N, therefore 2*W? Or does the equation only depend on the weight of the object?

There will be work going into accelerating it - that is true. But ... it comes to rest again. What it took accelerating, it gave back coming to rest didn't it?

That leaves just the vertical distance traveled then.

Now for your curved path consider that at any point if there is a slope that any movement horizontally is 0 work and you are then adding up only all the instantaneous incremental vertical displacements, just as if you lifted it straight up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K