Calculus II - Alternating Series Test - Convergent?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the convergence of the series ∞∑ (-1)n(3n-1)/(2n+1) using the Alternating Series Test. The user initially concluded that the series is divergent because the limit as n approaches infinity is 3/2, which does not satisfy the second condition of the test. However, other participants confirmed the user's conclusion that the series is indeed divergent, contradicting the textbook's assertion of convergence. The fundamental theorem of infinite series states that if the limit of the terms does not equal zero, the series cannot converge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Alternating Series Test
  • Familiarity with the Test for Divergence of a Series
  • Basic knowledge of limits in calculus
  • Ability to analyze series and their convergence properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the conditions for the Alternating Series Test in detail
  • Study the implications of the Test for Divergence of a Series
  • Practice additional problems involving convergence and divergence of series
  • Explore the concept of absolute convergence and its relationship to conditional convergence
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for Calculus II exams, educators teaching series convergence, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of infinite series and convergence tests.

captcouch
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello! I was working some practice problems for a Calc II quiz for Friday on the alternating series test for convergence or divergence of a series. I ran into a problem when I was working the following series, trying to determine whether it was convergent or divergent:

Homework Statement



\sum (-1)n\frac{3n-1}{2n+1}
n=1

Homework Equations


Alternating Series Test:
For an alternating series


\sum (-1)n-1bn
n=1

to converge, it must satisfy the following conditions:

1. bn+1 ≤ bn for all n in the series
2. lim bn = 0
n\rightarrow∞

Test for Divergence of a Series:
If the limit as n approaches infinity of a series does not exist or does not equal 0, the series is divergent.

The Attempt at a Solution


I first began by analyzing the limit as n approaches infinity for the series. By dividing the coefficients of the highest exponential power of the top and bottom (in this case, 1), I found the limit of the series to be \frac{3}{2}. It did not satisfy the second condition of the alternating series test, and as such, I sought to double-check with the Test for Divergence of a Series.

(-1)n's limit does not exist, as it is always alternating back and forth between -1 and 1.

\frac{3n-1}{2n+1}'s limit, as mentioned above, I found to be \frac{3}{2}.

From this information, I concluded that the limit did not exist, and that the series was divergent.

I decided to check the answer from the back of the textbook, and it said it was convergent! I ran through it again a couple of times and got the same result: divergent. I'm not sure what I did wrong here - could I please have some insight from someone else to shed some light on the situation? Thank you very much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
captcouch said:
Hello! I was working some practice problems for a Calc II quiz for Friday on the alternating series test for convergence or divergence of a series. I ran into a problem when I was working the following series, trying to determine whether it was convergent or divergent:

Homework Statement



\sum (-1)n\frac{3n-1}{2n+1}
n=1

Homework Equations


Alternating Series Test:
For an alternating series


\sum (-1)n-1bn
n=1

to converge, it must satisfy the following conditions:

1. bn+1 ≤ bn for all n in the series
2. lim bn = 0
n\rightarrow∞

Test for Divergence of a Series:
If the limit as n approaches infinity of a series does not exist or does not equal 0, the series is divergent.

The Attempt at a Solution


I first began by analyzing the limit as n approaches infinity for the series. By dividing the coefficients of the highest exponential power of the top and bottom (in this case, 1), I found the limit of the series to be \frac{3}{2}. It did not satisfy the second condition of the alternating series test, and as such, I sought to double-check with the Test for Divergence of a Series.

(-1)n's limit does not exist, as it is always alternating back and forth between -1 and 1.

\frac{3n-1}{2n+1}'s limit, as mentioned above, I found to be \frac{3}{2}.

From this information, I concluded that the limit did not exist, and that the series was divergent.

I decided to check the answer from the back of the textbook, and it said it was convergent! I ran through it again a couple of times and got the same result: divergent. I'm not sure what I did wrong here - could I please have some insight from someone else to shed some light on the situation? Thank you very much!

I'll tell you what's wrong here: your book. That series is definitely not convergent.
 
Man, you've got to be kidding me. Nobody's perfect, I guess. I'll be sure to tell my professor in the morning. Thanks for the help!
 
The most fundamental theorem about infinite series, typically the first proved in a textbook, is
If \lim_{n\to\infty} a_n\ne 0, then \sum a_n does NOT converge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K