MHB Can 20(s - t) Be an Integer in a Quartic Equation with No Real Roots?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining whether \(20(s-t)\) can be an integer given the quartic equation \((x^2+20sx+10t)(x^2+20tx+10s)=0\) has no real roots. It is established that for the equation to lack real roots, the discriminants of the quadratic factors must be negative, leading to the inequalities \(10s^2 < t\) and \(10t^2 < s\), which imply both \(s\) and \(t\) are positive. Further analysis shows that the maximum possible difference \(|s-t|\) is constrained to be less than \(1/20\), meaning \(20(s-t)\) must be less than \(1\). Since \(s\) and \(t\) are distinct, \(20(s-t)\) cannot equal zero, concluding that \(20(s-t)\) cannot be an integer.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

I don't know how to solve the problem below because I found what we are asked to prove is a bit confusing to me and hence I don't know how to formulate a credible way to solve the problem correctly.

Problem:

Let $s\ne t$ be real numbers. The equation $(x^2+20sx+10t)(x^2+20tx+10s)=0$ has no real roots.

State with reason, if $20(s-t)$ is or isn't an integer.

But one can tell if the quartic equation (which is given in factored form, a product of two quadratic functions) has no real roots, then the discriminant of each quadratic function is less than zero. i.e.

$(20s)^2-4(1)(10t)<0$ and $(20t)^2-4(1)(10s)<0$

Subtracting these two inequalities yields

$20(t-s)(10s+10t+1)<0$ or

$20(s-t)(10s+10t+1)>0$ (*)

By expanding the given equation we have

$x^4+20(s+t)x^3+10(s+2st+t)x^2+200(s^2+t^2)x+100ts=0$ (**)

I spent over an hour trying my best to see what relations that (*) and (**) have but I don't know how to go any further...could someone please help me, please?:)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Is 20(s-t) an integer?

anemone said:
Hi MHB,

I don't know how to solve the problem below because I found what we are asked to prove is a bit confusing to me and hence I don't know how to formulate a credible way to solve the problem correctly.

Problem:

Let $x\ne y$ be real numbers. The equation $(x^2+20sx+10t)(x^2+20tx+10s)=0$ has no real roots.

State with reason, if $20(s-t)$ is or isn't an integer.

But one can tell if the quartic equation (which is given in factored form, a product of two quadratic functions) has no real roots, then the discriminant of each quadratic function is less than zero. i.e.

$(20s)^2-4(1)(10t)<0$ and $(20t)^2-4(1)(10s)<0$
Those two inequalities say that $10s^2<t$ and $10t^2<s$. It follows that both $s$ and $t$ are positive. Take the square root of both sides in the second inequality, to get $\sqrt{10}t<\sqrt s.$ Therefore the point $(s,t)$ (and similarly the point $(t,s)$) must lie above the curve $y = 10x^2$ and below the curve $y = \sqrt{\dfrac x{10}}.$ Now use calculus to find the maximum value of $ \sqrt{\dfrac x{10}} - 10x^2.$ I found that the maximum occurs when $x = (16000)^{-1/3}$ and is equal to $\dfrac3{10(16)^{2/3}} \approx 0.04725.$ This is less than $1/20$, so it appears that $20(s-t)$ cannot be an integer.
 
Re: Is 20(s-t) an integer?

Hi Opalg,

Thank you very much for your guidance in this problem. I appreciate your help!:)
 
Re: Is 20(s-t) an integer?

My previous answer was only partially correct (in fact, it was wrong). It was correct to say that the point $(s,t)$ has to lie in the interior of the region between the curves $y = 10x^2$ and $y = \sqrt{\dfrac x{10}}$. But it was quite wrong to look at the greatest vertical separation between these curves. What we actually need to do is to maximise the difference $|s-t|$. To do that, we need to find where the point $(s,t)$ is as far as possible from the diagonal $y=x$ (the line where $|s-t| = 0$). The way to do that is to find where the tangent to one of the curves is parallel to the diagonal. So we need to differentiate $y=10x^2$ and put the derivative equal to $1$. That gives $20x=1$. So the point $\bigl(\frac1{20},\frac1{40}\bigr)$ lies on the curve, and its coordinates differ by $1/20$. That is the maximum possible difference for $|s-t|$, and it only occurs on the boundary curves. But the inequalities $10s^2<t$ and $10t^2<s$ are strict, so the point $(s,t)$ must lie in the interior of the region between the curves. For any such interior point we must have $|s-t|<1/20$. It follows that $20(s-t)$ cannot be an integer unless it is $0$. But the problem states that $s\ne t$ (actually, it says $x \ne y$ but since there is no $y$ in the problem I think that must be a misprint for $s\ne t$). Therefore $20(s-t)$ cannot be an integer.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top