Can a basic knowledge of perturbation theory solve this?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a set of coupled second-order differential equations involving functions f(u) and g(u) that are assumed to be small and periodic. Participants explore whether perturbation theory can be applied to this problem and discuss various methods for potentially decoupling the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the coupled equations and questions whether they can be solved with basic knowledge of perturbation theory.
  • Another suggests a substitution (a = x + y, b = x - y) to decouple the system, but later expresses doubt about its effectiveness.
  • A different participant acknowledges the difficulty of decoupling the equations with linear transformations and mentions a missed sign in the equations.
  • One participant proposes using complex numbers and suggests setting z = x + iy and w = f - ig to reformulate the equations, indicating this might simplify analysis.
  • Another participant agrees with the complex number approach but notes that finding a general solution may still be challenging depending on the form of w(u).
  • One participant elaborates on the use of perturbation theory, emphasizing the need to define an ordering for the small parameters and providing a detailed expansion approach for x and y in terms of a small parameter ε.
  • This participant outlines the process of equating terms of the same order in ε to create a hierarchy of equations to solve iteratively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of various methods for decoupling the equations and the applicability of perturbation theory. No consensus is reached on a definitive approach to solve the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of assumptions regarding the smallness of f and g and the need for a clear definition of the ordering in perturbation theory. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the validity of proposed methods and the complexity of the equations involved.

ozone
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have boiled a very long physics problem down to the point that I need to solve the coupled equations

\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial u^2} + xf(u) + yg(u) = 0

\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial u^2} + yf(u) - xg(u) = 0

We may assume that|f| ,|g| << 1. and that both f and g are periodic on the same interval T, i.e. f(u) = f(u+T),g(u) = g(u+T)
I was wondering if this is something that could be solved with little knowledge of perturbation theory or if this was a very advanced problem, and I was wondering if anyone had any useful resources. So far I have found that this would be relatively easy to solve if they weren't coupled, but this is a level of complexity which is beyond me

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Set a=x+y, b=x-y
This should decouple your system.
 
I tried this substitution but I'm very certain it will not actually uncouple these ode's, unless I am missing a very interesting algebra trick
 
Oh sorry, I missed the minus sign in the second equation.
Hmm... it is impossible to decouple them with linear transformations.

Edit: Oh, complex numbers are great.
 
Last edited:
ozone said:
Hello all,

I have boiled a very long physics problem down to the point that I need to solve the coupled equations

\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial u^2} + xf(u) + yg(u) = 0

\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial u^2} + yf(u) - xg(u) = 0

We may assume that|f| ,|g| << 1. and that both f and g are periodic on the same interval T, i.e. f(u) = f(u+T),g(u) = g(u+T)
I was wondering if this is something that could be solved with little knowledge of perturbation theory or if this was a very advanced problem, and I was wondering if anyone had any useful resources. So far I have found that this would be relatively easy to solve if they weren't coupled, but this is a level of complexity which is beyond me

Thank you.

If you set z = x + iy and (EDIT:) w = f - ig then your system becomes
<br /> \frac{d^2 z}{d u^2} + w(u)z = 0<br />
which may be easier to analyze.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
pasmith said:
If you set z = x + iy and w = f + ig then your system becomes
<br /> \frac{d^2 z}{d u^2} + w(u)z = 0<br />
which may be easier to analyze.

Depending on w(u), it may still be difficult to find the general solution.
If this second order ODE admits Liouvillian solutions, they can be found using Kovacic' algorithm, you can do this with e.g. Maple.
 
ozone said:
Hello all,

I have boiled a very long physics problem down to the point that I need to solve the coupled equations

\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial u^2} + xf(u) + yg(u) = 0

\frac{\partial^2 y}{\partial u^2} + yf(u) - xg(u) = 0

We may assume that|f| ,|g| &lt;&lt; 1. and that both f and g are periodic on the same interval T, i.e. f(u) = f(u+T),g(u) = g(u+T)
I was wondering if this is something that could be solved with little knowledge of perturbation theory or if this was a very advanced problem, and I was wondering if anyone had any useful resources. So far I have found that this would be relatively easy to solve if they weren't coupled, but this is a level of complexity which is beyond me

Thank you.

Yes you can probably use perturbation theory, but you have to first define your ordering. Its not enough that f and g are small. They have to be small compared to something.

As an example let's assume xg /\frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial u^2} is order \epsilon small. We also assume that x and y are of comparable magnitude, as are f and g. The validity of these assumptions depend on the problem, and you might have to alter the following approach depending on the problem. And its important to check that your final answer is consistent with this ordering.

With these assumptions we next expand x (and y) in terms of order \epsilon: x=\epsilon^0 x_0 + \epsilon^1 x_1 + \epsilon^2 x_2 + \dots. Here \epsilon is just an marker of smallness. We also note that \frac{\partial^2 }{\partial u^2} is order 1/\epsilon large and and it is helpful to write it as \frac{1}{\epsilon}\frac{\partial^2 }{\partial u^2}

Now we plug the expansions for x and y into the equation, and equate terms of the same order in \epsilon. This creates a hierarchy of equation that we can solve.

To lowest order we have:
\frac{\partial^2 x_0}{\partial u^2} = 0

\frac{\partial^2 y_0}{\partial u^2} = 0

The next order equation is
\frac{\partial^2 x_1}{\partial u^2} + x_0f(u) + y_0 g(u) = 0

\frac{\partial^2 y_1}{\partial u^2} + y_0f(u) - x_0 g(u) = 0

And all higher order equations are of this form:
\frac{\partial^2 x_j}{\partial u^2} + x_{j-1}f(u) + y_{j-1} g(u) = 0

\frac{\partial^2 y_j}{\partial u^2} + y_{j-1}f(u) - x_{j-1} g(u) = 0

Note that in each equation for x_j,y_j the terms x_{j-1},y_{j-1} are known from the previous equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K