Can aeroplanes be technically used as time travel machines?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies that traveling by airplane does not equate to time travel, despite the perception of being in a different time zone. Participants argue that changing locations does not alter the fundamental passage of time, as demonstrated through examples involving time zones like Mountain Standard Time (MST) and Central Standard Time (CST). The conversation emphasizes the importance of Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) in understanding time differences, asserting that local clocks merely reflect the position of the sun rather than an actual advancement into the future.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of time zones, specifically MST and CST
  • Familiarity with Universal Coordinated Time (UTC)
  • Knowledge of ISO 8601 notation for time representation
  • Basic concepts of time measurement and conversion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of time zones on international travel
  • Learn about the history and development of Universal Coordinated Time (UTC)
  • Explore the differences between timekeeping systems, such as GMT and UTC
  • Investigate the physics of time perception and relativity
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for travelers, educators, and anyone interested in the concepts of time zones, timekeeping, and the nature of time itself.

Jacinta
Messages
22
Reaction score
12
So I'm currently on holidays somewhere, and it's one hour ahead of where i live. Since i went on the areoplane and landed to a new country where the time is an hour ahead, this also means i technically landed into the future, right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ISamson
Physics news on Phys.org
No.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Bystander
Borek said:
No.

Why? Can you support your argument? :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jacinta
Borek said:
No.

But I'm technically one hour ahead of everyone back home, so I'm living one hour into the future.
 
No. Just like you won't be ahead of time if you just set your clock to time+1h without moving from home.
 
Borek said:
No. Just like you won't be ahead of time if you just set your clock to time+1h without moving from home.

But if you change the time on your phone that won't actually change the time, whereas I'm currently an hour ahead of everyone back home.
 
Jacinta said:
But I'm technically one hour ahead of everyone back home, so I'm living one hour into the future.
Call them on the phone and see if you have to wait an hour for a reply.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lekh2003, Bystander and phinds
russ_watters said:
Call them on the phone and see if you have to wait an hour for a reply.

They probably wouldn't even respond, but that's not the point.
 
Jacinta said:
They probably wouldn't even respond, but that's not the point.
Yes, it IS the point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #10
phinds said:
Yes, it IS the point.

i'm pretty sure the reason they wouldn't respond is not only due to time difference.
 
  • #11
It's the same time, but we need to write the time fully to see that.

Suppose Dorothy and her dog Toto are in Denver Colorado and it is 9AM.
We write it as 09:00 MST, where the 'MST' denotes Mountain Standard Time.
Or more fully as 09:00:00-07:00 in standardized ISO 8601 notation, which means we have subtracted 7 hours from Universal Coordinated Time (UTC).

Now she and her dog are magically transported to Kansas City (instantaneously), where it is 10AM, or rather 10:00 CST, with 'CST' for Central Standard Time.
Again more fully 10:00:00-06:00.
Both are also written as 16:00:00Z, which is the time that a clock at the zero meridian (Greenwich, England) shows.

So even though the local clock shows a different time than Dorothy's watch, which really represents the altitude of the sun, it really is the same (UTC) time.
It's similar to how degrees Fahrenheit are converted to degrees Celsius. It's a different number but the same temperature.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: newbz and Ryan_m_b
  • #12
Jacinta said:
They probably wouldn't even respond, but that's not the point.
I can see you are not being serious. Thread locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K