MHB Can Algebra of Sets Determine Solutions for Set Equations Like $AX=C$?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natalie1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Sets
Natalie1
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How would I solve this using the algebra of sets?

View attachment 5282
 

Attachments

  • 3.JPG
    3.JPG
    2.3 KB · Views: 125
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Help me please, how to solve this in algebra of sets?

Hello, Natalie! (Wave)

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?

I have also edited your post to include the question in the body. We do ask that the complete question be in the post rather than in the title of the thread only. :)
 
I don't have any idea how to solve such tasks. Thats why I ask for help. Maybe you can show the algorithm of solving it, if you know. Or, I would appreciate if you could advise me sites/books that show how to solve such equations. What should I do? I have no idea how to solve it, that's why I'm asking for help. Please, please help me. I know only laws View attachment 5283, but how to apply them? My progress is only in that I know that I must use De Morgan law here.
 

Attachments

  • 55.JPG
    55.JPG
    25.5 KB · Views: 120
I never studied set theory, but there are folks here who have, and now knowing where you stand with the problem, they will be better quipped to give you relevant help. :)
 
The equation simplifies to $AX=C$ where $C\subseteq A$. Therefore, $X=C\cup B$ where $B$ is any set disjoint with $A$.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
The equation simplifies to $AX=C$ where $C\subseteq A$. Therefore, $X=C\cup B$ where $B$ is any set disjoint with $A$.

Tell me how did you solve it? Can you recommend me books (in english, or in russian), that explain such kind of equations?
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top