Can an n-dimensional object fit entirely in n-1 dimensions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Einstein's Cat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d 3d Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical question of whether an n-dimensional object can exist entirely within n-1 dimensions. The consensus is that the answer is no, particularly when considering properties such as topology and geometry. The conversation references the Borsuk-Ulam theorem, which supports the notion that n-spheres cannot be embedded in (n-1)-dimensions. The clarity of terms like "exist entirely" and "fit in" is emphasized as crucial for addressing such questions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of n-dimensional geometry
  • Familiarity with the Borsuk-Ulam theorem
  • Knowledge of topology and its intrinsic properties
  • Basic mathematical definitions of dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem in topology
  • Explore the concept of embedding n-dimensional objects in lower dimensions
  • Study the definitions and properties of n-spheres
  • Investigate the relationship between dimensionality and degrees of freedom in geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students interested in advanced geometry, topology, and the philosophical implications of dimensionality.

Einstein's Cat
Messages
182
Reaction score
2
I am concerned that this question may instead be a philosophical one although if it it mathematical, any insights would be very appreciated. The question is this; could an object of N dimensions exist entirely in N-1 dimensions? In other words, could an infinitely flat object have 3 degrees of freedom and also be able to fit entirely in 2D space? Thank you and please excuse any naivety
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe , OP, you want to know if an n-dimensional object can be embedded in (n-1)-dimensions? Or are there other types of properties of the object that you want to preserve? I think you can say no for n-spheres (I think a corollary of Borsuk-Ulam theorem) and for ##\mathbb R^n ##, but I don't know of a more general result. But I think the answer ultimately depends on what (types of) intrinsic properties of the object you want to preserve in the lower dimensions: topology, geometry, etc.? Interesting question, though.
In one sense of dimension, the answer is no: if you see the dimension n of an object as the minimal number of coordinates of a point needed to uniquely identify each point in the space, then the answer would be (is) no.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Einstein's Cat

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K