Can Any Inner Product Be Defined in Infinite Dimensional Vector Spaces?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter neelakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inner product Product
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone,
I need a clarification:I read in E. Butkov's book that an inner product may always be imposed on a finite dimensional linear vector space in a variety of ways...Butkov does not explain the point...Can anyone please clarify this?

I wonder what it would be for an infinite dimensional case...As we all know that Hilbert space used in quantum mechanics is an infinite dimensional space. Yet all the books almost inherently define the scalar product in Hilbert space.Is there any hinge in the story?

-Thanks,

Neel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, a Hilbert space by definition must have an inner product defined on it. (A Hilbert space is a vector space over the real or complex numbers with a complete inner product.)

Secondly, in a finite-dimensional space, if you fix any positive-definite matrix M, then the expression [tex]\langle x,y \rangle = x^{\dagger}My[/tex] defines an inner product.

The usual dot product is a special case when M is the identity matrix.