Can anyone please verify/review this proof about primes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Primes Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a proof claiming there are infinitely many primes of the form n^2-2, with examples provided: 2, 7, 23, 47, and 79. Participants confirm the validity of these primes and add that 167 is also a valid example, derived from 13^2-2. The original poster seeks verification for their proof, emphasizing the importance of checking one's work in mathematics. The conversation highlights the need for peer confirmation in mathematical proofs, especially when textbooks lack answers. Overall, the proof is positively received, with multiple primes identified.
Math100
Messages
813
Reaction score
229
Homework Statement
It has been conjectured that there are infinitely many primes of the form n^2-2. Exhibit five such primes.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof: Suppose that there are infinitely many primes of the form n^2-2.
Then we have n^2-2=2^2-2=2,
n^2-2=3^2-2=7,
n^2-2=5^2-2=23,
n^2-2=7^2-2=47,
n^2-2=9^2-2=79.
Note that 2, 7, 23, 47, 79 are prime numbers.
Therefore, five such primes are 2, 7, 23, 47, 79.

Above is my proof/answer for this problem. Can anyone please review/verify it and tell me if it's correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Correct. 167 is another one.
 
  • Like
Likes Math100
fresh_42 said:
Correct. 167 is another one.
Yes, since 13^2-2=169-2=167.
 
Thank you so much for confirming.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, berkeman and fresh_42
Six down, infinity to go...:hammer:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes sysprog, PeroK, phinds and 2 others
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: It has been conjectured that there are infinitely many primes of the form n^2-2. Exhibit five such primes.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Proof: Suppose that there are infinitely many primes of the form n^2-2.
Then we have n^2-2=2^2-2=2,
n^2-2=3^2-2=7,
n^2-2=5^2-2=23,
n^2-2=7^2-2=47,
n^2-2=9^2-2=79.
Note that 2, 7, 23, 47, 79 are prime numbers.
Therefore, five such primes are 2, 7, 23, 47, 79.

Above is my proof/answer for this problem. Can anyone please review/verify it and tell me if it's correct?
I am puzzled. What part of this did you have trouble verifying? Checking your own work is an important part of learning math.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK and Math100
FactChecker said:
I am puzzled. What part of this did you have trouble verifying? Checking your own work is an important part of learning math.
I just want to make sure if my proof is perfect and correct, because my textbook doesn't provide answers. And I want to get confirmation from experts.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
Back
Top