Can Commutation between Subgroups be Achieved without Assuming Normality?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the possibility of achieving commutation between two subgroups R and T without assuming normality. The user presents a scenario where R and T do not commute, specifically questioning if there exist elements r' in R and t' in T such that rt = t'r'. The conversation highlights that if one of the subgroups is normal, such as T being a normal subgroup of the supergroup G=RT, then a solution can be derived using commutators. However, the main inquiry remains whether a more general algebraic approach can be established without the normality condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically subgroups and normal subgroups.
  • Familiarity with commutators in group theory.
  • Knowledge of matrix manipulations in the context of group operations.
  • Basic understanding of 2D transformations, including rotations and translations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of normal subgroups and their implications in group theory.
  • Study the concept of commutators and their role in determining subgroup relationships.
  • Explore algebraic structures that allow for non-normal subgroup interactions.
  • Investigate specific examples of non-commuting subgroups in various mathematical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, group theorists, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of subgroup interactions and commutation properties.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
let's suppose I have two subgroups R and T, and I know that in general they do not commute: that is, rt\neq tr for some r\in R, t\in T.

Is it possible, perhaps after making specific assumptions on R and T, to find some r'\in R, and t'\in T such that: rt=t'r'.

This is possible, for example, with some matrix manipulations if R and T are respectively the groups of rotations and translations in 2D. I was wondering if it is possible to find a more general algebraic approach without making explicit how R and T are defined.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, mnb96. A few questions:

Do the subgroups have trivial intersection? Are they part of any specific supergroup?

How about looking at the group table (or, otherwise, how is the group given to you)?
 
Hi Bacle2,
thanks for your help. I consider R and T as being subgroups of the supergroup G=RT, and I do not assume that R and T have trivial intersection.

However I noticed that if I assume that at least one of the two subgroups is normal, then I could solve the problem. Let's suppose for example that T is a normal subgroup of G=RT, then we have:
rt=[r,t]tr where [r,t] is the commutator. Thus, rt=(rtr^{-1})t^{-1}tr and since T is normal we have: rt=t'r where t'=rtr^{-1}\in T.

If you define T as the group of 2D translations and R as the group of 2D rotations, and observe that T is a normal subgroup of G=RT, the above construction actually yields a well-known result...

I just wonder if it is possible to drop the assumption of normality and still come up with some more general result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
11K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
10K