Can Early Dark Energy Affect Standard Rulers in Cosmology?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the paper "Shifting the Universe: Early Dark Energy and Standard Rulers" by Eric V. Linder and Georg Robbers, which explores how early dark energy at high redshift affects the cosmic sound horizon and the distance to the last scattering of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The authors demonstrate that early dark energy can obscure its effects in CMB temperature and polarization spectra, leading to biases in cosmological parameters when using the sound horizon as a standard ruler in baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO). Adjusting for the absolute ruler scale can mitigate this bias but reduces the effectiveness of the BAO technique by a factor of two.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmic microwave background (CMB) physics
  • Familiarity with baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO)
  • Knowledge of dark energy concepts in cosmology
  • Basic grasp of cosmological parameter fitting techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of early dark energy on cosmic structure formation
  • Study the methodology of fitting absolute ruler scales in cosmology
  • Explore the effects of cosmic sound horizon on cosmological measurements
  • Investigate the relationship between CMB polarization and dark energy
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and researchers interested in the effects of dark energy on cosmological measurements and the interpretation of CMB data.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
Has anyone read this paper?

Shifting the Universe: Early Dark Energy and Standard Rulers
Authors: Eric V. Linder, Georg Robbers
Comments: 6 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: Astrophysics (astro-ph)

The presence of dark energy at high redshift influences both the cosmic sound horizon and the distance to last scattering of the cosmic microwave background. We demonstrate that through the degeneracy in their ratio, early dark energy can lie hidden in the CMB temperature and polarization spectra, leading to an unrecognized shift in the sound horizon. If the sound horizon is then used as a standard ruler, as in baryon acoustic oscillations, then the derived cosmological parameters can be nontrivially biased. Fitting for the absolute ruler scale (just as supernovae must be fit for the absolute candle magnitude) removes the bias but decreases the leverage of the BAO technique by a factor 2.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Link: http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.2877

Submitted two days ago. I did a quick read. My interest in cosmology is fairly limited. What I have learned is geared more as a testing ground for physics. One of the reasons I insist on separating the model from the empirical content. I see nothing really surprising in that paper though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K