Dark Energy in Light of the Cosmic Horizon

Click For Summary
The paper "Dark Energy in Light of the Cosmic Horizon" by Fulvio Melia argues against the viability of a cosmological constant, suggesting instead a dynamic dark energy model that aligns with the cosmic horizon. The discussion highlights concerns regarding the model's ability to address key cosmological observations, such as the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and Type Ia supernova data, with critics pointing out that it fails to account for the established consistency of the Lambda Cold Dark Matter (LCDM) model across multiple observational pillars. Additionally, the proposed model's implications for the universe's age and structure formation raise questions about its validity, as it does not adequately resolve existing issues like the substructure problem. Critics emphasize that any new cosmological model must comprehensively explain all relevant data rather than selectively address specific aspects. Overall, while the paper presents an intriguing perspective, it faces significant skepticism regarding its scientific rigor and empirical support.
  • #31
Recent post on this issue: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1001.4795

Interestingly (and I say so as an author), the time average of the deceleration parameter
appears to be very close to zero.


Through the Looking Glass: Why the "Cosmic Horizon" is not a horizon
Authors: Pim van Oirschot, Juliana Kwan, Geraint F. Lewis
(Submitted on 26 Jan 2010)

Abstract: The present standard model of cosmology, $\Lambda$CDM, contains some intriguing coincidences. Not only are the dominant contributions to the energy density approximately of the same order at the present epoch, but we note that contrary to the emergence of cosmic acceleration as a recent phenomenon, the time averaged value of the deceleration parameter over the age of the universe is nearly zero. Curious features like these in $\Lambda$CDM give rise to a number of alternate cosmologies being proposed to remove them, including models with an equation of state w = -1/3. In this paper, we examine the validity of some of these alternate models and we also address some persistent misconceptions about the Hubble sphere and the event horizon that lead to erroneous conclusions about cosmology.

Comments: Accepted for publication by MNRAS, 6 pages, 3 figures
Subjects: Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:1001.4795v1 [astro-ph.CO]
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K